![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,015
|
![]()
Yes David, all true.
However, if we were to remove all dress items from this blade, what classification do you believe most experienced students of the keris would give it? By "classification" I mean "tangguh". |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 290
|
![]()
I wasn't asked, so please excuse me for butting in, Alan. But I am interested and it's been awhile since your question has gotten a response.
Would this keris permit a Banten classification? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,218
|
![]() Quote:
Sorry i didn't respond to the question earlier, but i somehow missed it. I have never considered tangguh my strong suit. I am often much better at noticing why a particular blade could NOT be something rather than proclaiming what i believe it actually IS. I see some similar ricikan that we might see on Banten keris, but not the level of execution i would expect. The blumbangen seems a bit too square and small (more like Mataram) here and i would expect to see greneng and perhaps even jenggot on keris Banten. We don't have a good overall shot, but from what i can see the luk seem too shallow for the usual Banten blade. And if i recall, don't most Banten keris have something more a kin to a Bali finish? In fact i liken Keris Banten somewhat to the look Bali keris. Not sure i know what answer Alan was looking for, but i might have suggested Palembang regardless of dress is pushed to make a call. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|