![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 71
|
![]() Quote:
The black coating that is seen on the inside of the lock and inside the pistol is old oil or grease that is very sticky(it can be confused for unpolished steel on the photo). Photos attached in half and fully cocked. The springs are made well, making the lock fuction well. The last photo is of a few other pistols signed by well known Gunsmiths, having collected pistols for over 40 years, I have tried to find something wrong with the Tower stamped pistol pair. After checking the needles on the screws Udo(Corrado) says are not there in fact are there and fuction well and taking the pistols apart, checking Fernados constructions descriptions. I thank Raf for his constructive inputs. Udo says the screws are just screws when they in reality have needles in the end that penetrates the touch holes and the all steel construction seems right. The inside of the locks are correctly made for the period 1780 - 1810. Based on what I can see, I am asking you humbly, Fernando to inform me your knowledge of who and were and when in India these pistols are made ? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]() Quote:
. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 71
|
![]()
And here are some without your detail, also in all steel:
Last edited by Tordenskiold1721; 2nd May 2022 at 11:45 AM. Reason: Change of half Cocked photo |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]() Quote:
![]() You are right, the pair you show (and edited) have a different system. Proof marks, if there were, should be on top of the barrel; often those of Birmingham, in Scottish pistols. . |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|