![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
One of a very well known dealers had in his catalogue a true Pala blade with a disproportionally long yataghan handle.
I am still kicking myself for not buying it. I recently contacted him and asked whether he had a copy of the catalogue: no, he sold all of them. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 1,340
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 409
|
![]()
I agree, Mr Alnakkas,
Swords, or saif, found either in what is now Saudi Arabia, or in photographs taken in what is now Saudi Arabia, seem to be of these two distinctive types, but never a hybrid of the two. I would imagine the two originate in distinctively different areas, i.e. the pala or kilij outside the Arabian peninsular, and the saif within, from Syria and Iraq, southward. Regards Richard |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
Marriages of unrelated blades and handles are older than dirt. After all, there were no " regulation patterns" and each owner was free to rev up his fantasies.
Miller in his book on Caucasian arms shows a marriage of a Khanda blade with a typical Georgian Khmali handle. CharlesS here had shown us multiple even crazier examples. BTW, many of those mixed marriages last longer than those of their owners:-) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|