Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > European Armoury
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 1st May 2017, 01:09 PM   #1
Cerjak
Member
 
Cerjak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: FRANCE
Posts: 1,065
Default A heavy French siege helmet Excavated in Bourgogne.

A heavy French siege helmet Excavated in Bourgogne.
Two pieces skull faceted in fourteen sections with a pivoted peak
This helmet is with additional plates mounted on the skull .
Siege helmet with such faceted skull are very rare.
Weight about 7 kg.
Any comment on it would be welcome.
Attached Images
         

Last edited by Cerjak; 1st May 2017 at 05:23 PM.
Cerjak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd May 2017, 09:42 AM   #2
cornelistromp
Member
 
cornelistromp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,058
Default

weight of 7kg is not possible for a helmet , do you maybe mean 1.7kg ?

best,
Jasper
cornelistromp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd May 2017, 10:02 AM   #3
Cerjak
Member
 
Cerjak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: FRANCE
Posts: 1,065
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cornelistromp
weight of 7kg is not possible for a helmet , do you maybe mean 1.7kg ?

best,
Jasper
Siege Helmet
Jasper,
There is no mistake in the weight ,some siege helmet are about 10 kg ( see this example
http://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/26527
Date:ca. 1600–1650
Culture:French
Medium:Steel
Dimensions:H. 11 7/8 in. (30.16 cm); W. 9 7/8 in. (25.08 cm); D. 11 1/2 in. (29.2 cm); Wt. 20 lb. 9 oz (9.34 kg)
Classification:Helmets
Credit Line:Gift of William H. Riggs, 1913
Accession Number:14.25.495
a second siege helmet from my collection
http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...t=siege+helmet
Best

Jean-Luc
Attached Images
 
Cerjak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd May 2017, 06:52 PM   #4
Cerjak
Member
 
Cerjak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: FRANCE
Posts: 1,065
Default the bullet Proof

That dent is the bullet impact Proving that the helmet would absorb fire from hand gun, the dent it made in the skull, showing that the bullet didn't penetrate.
Attached Images
 
Cerjak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd May 2017, 07:50 PM   #5
cornelistromp
Member
 
cornelistromp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,058
Default

I see, very heavy to wear though.

best,
Jasper
cornelistromp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd May 2017, 08:00 PM   #6
fernando
(deceased)
 
fernando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
Default

Owners necks would have to be stronger than those of Formula 1 pilots, due to G force .
fernando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd May 2017, 10:14 AM   #7
kronckew
Member
 
kronckew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,183
Default

a lot of the weight would be distributed down to the rest of the armour and padding the helmet rested on and thus the shoulders took a lot of the burden. i think they and the rest of the armour were heavier as manning the walls didn't require the same mobility as on a battle field, and the extra thickness helped against missiles. if the enemy ever got over the walls and fighting became hand to hand, a lighter armour might be better. you could switch if you knew when they were going to make it over.
kronckew is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.