![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 14
|
![]()
Hello again everyone!
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,830
|
![]()
Hi, the bigger one looks like it could well be African currency, I have no idea about the other one. They both lack the finnish that you would expect of early metalwork in the Americas.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: OKLAHOMA, USA
Posts: 3,138
|
![]()
I HAVE VERY LITTLE INFO ON SUCH THINGS BUT IF THEY ARE COPPER IT IS POSSIBLE THEY CAME FROM THE AMERICAS BUT IF THEY ARE BRONZE THEY CAME FROM SOMEWHERE ELSE AS THERE WAS NO BRONZE AGE IN THE AMERICAS AS FAR AS I KNOW. THE LARGER ONE DOES APPEAR TO BE FOR CEREMONIAL USE OR AS STATED AS MONEY THE SMALLER ONE LOOKS LIKE IT COULD HAVE BEEN USED AS A TOOL OR WEAPON AS IT HAS THE SHAPE OF A STONE CELT. GOOD LUCK
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,161
|
![]()
These items, while inclining toward some sort of axe heads, seem to have strong resemblance to utilitarian implements, such as scrapers for hides etc. The larger one, with its semilunar shape very much suggests a form of the knives used by the women for such purposes and termed 'ulu' (Stone , p.647).
These items, which evolved from early stone examples, are also described in "Eskimo and Native American Artifacts of North America", C.Miles, p.78, #3.28. The earlier examples are smaller with more closely radiused edge, but the later metal examples seem to have instances of the much wider, flared head with radiused edge. The other example, while again, axe like, seems to suggest something for scraping in the same manner. It is also noted these were equally used as chopping instruments in utility. Just speculation of course, but the similarity seems compelling. Best regards, Jim |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|