![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,252
|
![]()
This is a really small dagger which I like a lot! I hope the other keris folks will enjoy it, too...
![]() These are often referred to as boy's or women's keris although the nice kemuning hilt of this example is not undersized. I'd love to hear first-hand stories of their relevance in Bugis culture. BTW, is Dendiyar back from the mountains? ![]() I'm a bit stumped regarding the scabbard which seems very "utilitarian" compared to other Bugis pieces. It's made from very light wood - maybe pine?!? Assuming that one day I may want to upgrade the scabbard (and pendoko) what would be the most appropriate style for this blade? Pics of actual examples (possibly for blades of this small size) would be greatly appreciated! There are a few rust spots which I'm going to tackle by electrolytic rust removal. The dry wood of the scabbard could use some boiled linseed oil, I guess. Any veto or suggestions what else to fix/exchange while I'm at it? General comments very welcome, too! This sele also came with a story: The former owner was invited to eat at the home of a chess acquaintance in Ujung Pandang. There he chanced over a small keris collection. Bold as longnoses sometimes are, he asked wether the host might be interested to part from a keris or two but was going to be turned down by him. However, his wife happened to vote for the money - the ultimate nightmare of married collectors (some of us can relate to that)... ![]() ![]() ![]() Regards, Kai (blade pics: hilt turned for photography...) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,252
|
![]()
(left side)
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,252
|
![]()
(right side)
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,252
|
![]()
Sorry, measurements to follow soon...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,252
|
![]()
BTW, I assume that this keris is Makassarese? If so, is it politically correct to pigeon-hole it as a "Keris Bugis" or is there a more suitable catch-all term?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,248
|
![]()
Hi Kai,
The blade looks like a javanese patrem with it's thin and longer ganja. It looks as though it was reshaped from a longer piece. The pamor lines does not flow with the luks. (I have a javanese patrem, of a different form. See here). The blade and the sandang walikat sheath form looks complementary to each other. In your assembly, the hilt and pendokok (hilt cup) looks a little 'out of place'. Without the longer 'neck' of the pendokok, the hilt would probably would not fit the entire length of the peksi. The hulu and pendokok is of the Sulawesi (Celebes) form. I have a short Sulawesi keris with a mini tebeng-styled sheath. See it here. (The sheath is complementary to the form. But don't follow my pendokok ![]() Nevertheless, should you decide to change the sheath, I would recommend a tebeng-styled sheath or another Sulawesi form (see here). Feel free to disagree. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,209
|
![]()
Kai, Alam Shah is right. The blade is a javanese one. Javanese blades were highly apreciated so it is no surprise that you see javanese blades mounted as a buginese keris.
But i don't think yours is a bugis. The walikat sandang sheath is more javanese and the uikiran is too large for this blade. I guess that the previous owner replaced it. Maybe you can find a small ukiran for a patrem to complete its javanese origin. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 474
|
![]()
Hello Kai,
Could you describe the process of electrolytic rust removal or direct me to a source of information for same? I would really like to try out the method. Sincerely, RobT |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,252
|
![]() Quote:
I just started a new thread on this method so that others can join in... http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showthread.php?p=14089 Regards, Kai |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |||
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,252
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
![]() Regards, Kai |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,252
|
![]() Quote:
What kind of wood would this be if of Javanese origin? (It's carved pretty crudely and the wood is very light.) AFAIK, there are no pines on Jawa but they are native to Sulawesi (mountain peaks)... As given above, the blade is really stubby. The Sulawesi hilt is of average size, give or take. The whole assembly is feels more like a Moro gunong than the more graceful keris patrem I've seen pics of! Regards, Kai |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,248
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Last edited by Alam Shah; 6th September 2005 at 03:40 AM. Reason: grammar |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,252
|
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() What I meant though: Why would one want to narrow down the original luks and thereby messing with the pamor miring instead of just shortening the blade? Regards, Kai |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,248
|
![]()
I guess, smaller blade is easier to conceal and use, for women (or men), in close quarters engagement. That's what patrems are for.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,252
|
![]() Quote:
However, I still don't see why it would be preferable (from a functional POV) to "smooth out" the originally broader luk since the total width of the blade doesn't seem limiting to me. If a more slender blade is the main goal, just grind off both edges equally (following the pamor) and, thus, preserve the original shape/proportions. So, is the actually seen change of blade proportions/design some sort of traditional dapur "requirement" for keris Jawa? Of course, it's much easier to rework a pamor mlumah (tiban) blade but I have problems to imagine that a bladesmith would compromise a nice pamor miring for anything but a very good reason... Any ideas? Regards, Kai |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,248
|
![]()
Beats me?
![]() The outer part of the luks are more prone to rust and corrosion. It might be a reason. Just guessing. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,209
|
![]()
Kai,
I'm not very good on wood species. Certainly not from pictures. I wouldn't be surprised if it turned out to be a sheath made by someone who isn't a sheathcarver at all. Maybe the previous european owner. The form is a walikat sandang but not very elegant as a walikat sandang should be. It could be very well made of pine wood. In that case my theorie could come very close to the truth. The blade could be shortenend very well. There are some signs to it. The proportions of the prabot are to big for the length of the blade. And the blade is to broad in comparison to its length |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | ||
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,252
|
![]()
Hello Henk,
Sorry for forgetting to answer! ![]() Quote:
Quote:
Any other insights from our friends experienced in things Jawa (or Sulawesi!)? Thanks! Regards, Kai |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1
|
![]()
looks like the blade, the hilt, hilt cup and the sheath are from different origins. from the photos ... looks like the sheath should be bigger than the one you have, the hilt should be smaller.
keris bugis is definitely not .... it is extremely rare for a keris to be "lok 3". usually keris lok 3 is used by womens. it is easier to conceal them. sometime keris lok 3 is being used as a house for the spirits or khadams to protect the owner of the keris. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 401
|
![]()
Dear Possum & other keris lovers,
On the contrary, Lok 3 keris are produced more compare to lok 5, 7 & so on as according to Malay's belief, the more loks the keris is, the higher the position the bearer (and more talismanic values). However, since lok 3 was reserved to the lowest ranking courtiers, they are not really appealing to current collectors due to obvious reasons, furthermore, most of the lower ranking courtiers, after their retirement, mostly they just disappeared (because they were less significant) thus less we see lok 3 keris nowadays. This principle does not apply however, to straight blades. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 | |||
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,252
|
![]()
Hello all,
Thanks for the continued input! I agree that this is a really weird piece (and very likely a mix from different sources). I kinda like odd-balls though... ![]() ![]() I'm not looking for high praise but rather would like to understand why this very basic keris ended up like it did and how this relates to local use/customs/etc. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Any additional insights? Regards, Kai |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|