![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 485
|
![]()
some will be be familiar with the name and the catalogues. if ever there was a dealer that catered for EVERYONE on this forum, it was W.D.Oldman.
years ahead of his time, and holding great all round knowledge of the antiquities he dealt in. george cameron stone was a regular visitor to his small shop in brixton, south london. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 485
|
![]()
more.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Merseyside, UK
Posts: 222
|
![]()
Whoa!
I would love to walk into somewhere like that and just spend the afternoon browsing. ![]() I don't suppose you get places like that anymore. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 987
|
![]()
Beautiful stuff! Now I want some Oldman catalogues ....
FWIW, my take on the dha is below. I am starting to sort of veer off into the woods with the classification versus what’s been used so far, so others likely have a different view. I haven't made any changes to original classifications on my web site, so please forgive inconsistencies In the first picture, between the axe and the buffalo head, left to right: a) Lanna style from northern Thailand (see, e.g., ## 71, 72 & C46 on the DRI, link below), b) Burman (the people specifically, not the country) style, with a Kachin influenced blade (this one may actually qualify as a dha-ma, i.e., a chopper rather than a sword; compare to ## 50, C9, C55 & C64) c) another Lanna style from northern Thailand, d) hard to tell, as the handle appears to be missing, I’ll venture a guess that it is Burman, based on the scabbard, e)this looks like a yatagan, not a dha, it must have snuck in from above, f) another Lanna style from northern Thailand, g) a bit hard to see, but it looks to me to be a “village” Shan style, but there might be a bit of a pommel, and metal ferrule, which might make it a Lanna style (I just can't tell from the picture whether it is a simple wrapped handle with glare around it, or something more elaborate). In the second picture in the second post: 7)-10) Burman, based on the relatively straight blades and square tips of the scabbards [see, e.g., DRI ## C23 & C33, though 8)-10) could possibly be Shan, based on the somewhat longer grip, but I am sticking with Burman ![]() 12) dha-ma chopper that could be from just about anywhere in Burma or northern Thailand; 14)&15) dha-mauk utility knives that could be from just about anywhere in Burma or northern Thailand; 6) Burman [see, e.g., DRI ## 50, 51, C1, C4 & C64]; 1) the handle looks like it broke in two and was repaired, the part closest to the blade looks to be Lanna style; 2)&3) Shan [see, e.g., DRI ## 70 & C52, and the scabbards of most of the daggers on the DRI]; 4)&5) I believe this to be a Burman style [see DRI ## 62&65], 5) might possible be a Ratankosin era Thai dha, based on the unadorned silver covered scabbard, the pommel and flared ferrule, but overall the handle looks wrong – the pommel is a touch too big and it looks to have either wood or rattan wrapping in the middle; 13) Kachin [see DRI ## C27, C48 & C49], another possiblity for this one is a "double" sword where the blades are each sheathed in the handle of the other, such that when you grip the ends of the resulting staff and pull apart, you get a sword in each hand. Egerton describes and illustrates one, but I don't have a scan handly. 11) is a bit of a mystery, as the handle is broken and the down-turned blade is a bit unusual, I will hypothesize that it is a Lower Burmese style (maybe Burman, maybe Talaing (Mon)), influenced by Malaysia. Compare it to DRI # C62, which has the same type of blade, and a carved ivory handle of a style typical of southern Burma. The Dha Research Index |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 485
|
![]()
hi mark,
whilst oldman was knowledgable in his own right, and privy to information about his pieces (having bought them indirectly from source), his descriptions were basic and of the 1900s (in the dha page - 1906). knowledge, obviously, has progressed since. all the dha are classified as burmese on that page, with the following page classified as siamese (it has one dha and other items inc a war coat - i believe you have this image). as its a catalogue, i'm sure there was more information that wasnt included in his short descriptions. shame, eh! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 485
|
![]()
mark,
the page refering to the dha. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,718
|
![]()
Nice stuff, thank's for showing. I am quite shure I could have gotten rather pennyless after having shopped by Mr. Oldman, at to days prices.
Jens |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,725
|
![]()
I'm pleased to advise that I own dha #8 under "Burmah". I obtained it from a friend on this forum, who had Philip Tom polish it. It's got a pattern-welded/forge-folded blade of remarkable quality. Very light, spring-tempered and differentially hardened with a prominent "hamon" affect, likely from an inserted edge.
It's one of my prized possessions. ![]() ![]() Last edited by Andrew; 29th August 2005 at 11:14 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 987
|
![]()
Thanks for the additional information. It is not unlikely that all of these swords (not considering the ones in the picture of the shop itself) were collected in Burma, since the Shan items likely come from the Shan States in Eastern Burma. The odd man out is #1, which I am pretty sure is a Lanna style, which would make it from the region further east, around Chiang Mai or Luang Prabang. However, given the constant warfare between Burma and Thailand, it is not unreasonable to assume this one made its way into Burma as a spoil of war. #11 I see has an ivory handle, so it is very like the one on my web site. An #13 is a sword stick, huh? I have no data on those. Perhaps a travellor's or merchant's weapon? Or one made for a European? Its a pretty nifty piece, though.
I see from the descriptions page that there are also pieces from Siam in the catalogue. Any chance of getting a look at those? ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 485
|
![]()
hi mark,
i've attached the next page, but i believe you already have this (you posted it elsewhere on this forum). andrew, very nice. i think that many pieces from these catalogues must appear now and then. i know i am patiently waiting for a couple of particular items, which i hope will appear on the market one day in my lifetime. however, they may be permanantly locked into a private collection but can hope... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Istanbul
Posts: 452
|
![]()
Is that a complete intact Turkish horse head armor among 16th century breast & shoulder plates?? Worths too much today! Do you know from which year these pictures are?
regards Last edited by erlikhan; 29th August 2005 at 08:47 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 485
|
![]()
it is a turkish chanfron, complete with side pieces. the sections of mail are from a turkish horse armour as well. it is very nice and, as you say, very rare.
the catalogues stopped being dated after 1908, but from the catalogue number, i would assume the date to be 1910. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 987
|
![]()
You are indeed correct, I do have that page & its description. And speaking of owning swords from the catalogue, I would love to track down the one on that second page. Its unusual and looks lovely, I think. Its difficult to say what region/era it is from in Thailand.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Land below the wind
Posts: 135
|
![]()
Whoa! A Guan Gung statue (1st pic), keris panjang/penyalang (executioner) and a Tajong with a non-matching blade (last pic of first post) and a Java Demam on a Bugis blade (?) (3rd pic of 2nd post) plus some nice Borneon stuffs as well.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 987
|
![]()
I was inspecting the cartouche on the blade of Andrew's "Oldman" dha, and it struck me that it may well be a date written in Burmese numerals. They are very stretched out vertically, but I believe they read 1242 (if I am right, the first numeral should be a left-facing crescent, the second like the letter J without the cross at the top, the third sort of like a 9 but with an open loop, and the fourth again like a J). The Burmese calendar is based on the Chulasakarat Buddhist era, which adds 638 to the Western calendar. So if this is a date, it would be 1880.
It also looks vaguely like the Western date 1751, but I think it more likely is a Burmese date. Do you have any close-ups of the cartouche, Andrew? I blew up a section of your picture, but it is pretty blurry. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 485
|
![]()
hi mark,
until andrew replies, here is a poor, but clearer image |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,725
|
![]()
I recall reading on Ashoka's website (where I first saw this sword) that the date translated to approximately 1800 C.E. My recollection is suspect, however. Here's a close-up of the cartouche:
![]() Last edited by Andrew; 30th August 2005 at 09:23 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Istanbul
Posts: 452
|
![]()
Is there information about the prices of the items sold in that shop and period?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,725
|
![]() Quote:
I agree Mark: 1242 Chulasakarat (1880 AD). ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 485
|
![]()
hi erlikhan,
these were catalogues and so everything was priced. believe me, you really dont want to go down that road. 1906 prices should remain a thing of the past, as it will only lead to reminiscing and frustration. £30 will buy you all the turkish arms on that one page. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,718
|
![]()
What does the catalogue text say about the kora at the bottom, shown on the last picture in mail #2?
Jens |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 485
|
![]()
hi jens,
i am not surprised you picked this one one, as it is very unusual and i think very early. he doesnt off much past an overall description. - engraved full length, worn and inlaid with brass at the head. the back is engraved and inlaid with a band of brass. iron hilt, fluted, engraved and inlaid with brass. black leather covered sheath. length 27.75 inches. end width 3.25 inches. a 'very old specimen'. he does list another, vitually identical a few years later, but without a scabbard (unless its the same one and he lost the scabbard :-) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 987
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: GA USA
Posts: 76
|
![]()
What about this wall: The Ward collection 19th century, now at Smithsonian.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: GA USA
Posts: 76
|
![]()
The next room.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,180
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: OKLAHOMA, USA
Posts: 3,138
|
![]() ![]() I WONDER IF THE SMITHSONIAN HAS ANY OF THE PROVENANCE AND STORYS THAT WENT WITH THE COLLECTION OR JUST A LOT OF STORED STUFF WITH TAGS THAT ARE UNREADABLE OR CRUMBELING TO DUST DUE TO ACID IN THE PAPER. I HAVE SEEN SOME COPYS OF PAGES FROM THE OLDMANS CATALOGS BUT DON'T OWN ANY AS I UNDERSTAND THEY ARE VERY EXPENSIVE BUT I HAVE ALWAYS ENJOYED LOOKING THRU THE OLD ARMS CATALOGS. SOME ARE BETTER AT IDENTIFING THE THINGS IN THEM THAN OTHERS I WONDER HOW ACCURATE OLDMANS, BANNERMAN AND SOME OF THE LARGER OLDER ONES WERE?. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Land below the wind
Posts: 135
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 485
|
![]() Quote:
also, not that i'm competative, but would get the african/south east asian/islamic-indian members 'fighting' in one post ![]() however, could be a lot of effort and posts, only to have zalmoxis as the winner anyway. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Witness Protection Program
Posts: 1,730
|
![]()
barry,
why don't you start a new thread about displays (private or public). i think there was one on the old eewrs, but most of the pics have disintegrated to a small red 'x'. would be nice to get ideas from fellow forumites on how to display these weapons... ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|