![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Austin, Texas USA
Posts: 257
|
![]()
If it were mine - and I have a few that are in about that condition - I would leave it as is. Appreciate it as an artifact that shows considerable use for the purpose for which it was made. If you grind away a significant portion of the blade to remove the damaged area, all that history is reduced to metal shavings. If you need a kukri to use, buy a new one and promote the preservation of an ancient craft in a very poor country. There is nothing about the condition of that "old warhorse" (to adopt Spiral's eloquent description) that a collector should be ashamed of or apologize for.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Centerville, Kansas
Posts: 2,196
|
![]()
Please don't grind the blade down to remove the damaged area
![]() Robert |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The Sharp end
Posts: 2,928
|
![]()
Hmmm,
well, the thing is.......... The reason I buy things like this is because it sadens me to see them in such a god awful state. I would feel bad owning it and not trying to restore its funtionality. I think its what 'it' would want. Last edited by Atlantia; 10th March 2010 at 10:54 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 40
|
![]()
I agree with Berk, if the damage to the blade looks old then let it be.
Who know what history that blade and its dings has to tell. Warren in Arizona |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|