![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 607
|
![]()
I asked someone who might have the scans, but cannot guarantee anything.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,192
|
![]()
Thanks Dmitry.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 607
|
![]()
No answer yet, but I was directed to another source, which apparently served as an inspiration for A.North - Catalogue de la collection d'armes anciennes européennes et orientales de Charles Buttin, publ. Rumilly, 1933, namely the examples 96-100.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,242
|
![]()
Hi Jim,
My library has this magazine. I will check if they have the volume with the article you seek and scan it for you in the next few days. All the best and drive safe in the new year ![]() Emanuel |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,192
|
![]()
Hi Emanuel,
Thanks so much! Its good to hear from you. Happy new year to you also! ![]() Dmitry, Thanks very much for the heads up on the Buttin source. Very much appreciate the assist and I'll check that out. All very best regards, Jim |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PR, USA
Posts: 679
|
![]()
Heads up in the Buttin?
My, Jim, you are a kidder, you! : ) Best M Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,192
|
![]()
Good grief! I guess I better be more careful in wording.....certainly never even thought of that perception and have often used the heads up expression.
My sincere intent was to express appreciation for the notice on the 'Charles Buttin' reference, which has long been colloquially termed 'Buttin' among collectors. I would never use that name in such a derogatory manner, the Buttin's are proudly good personal friends of mine for many years. I appreciate humor as much as the next guy, but not particularly at such expense, and in this case in poor taste. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|