![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
Better pics of the stamps on the blade and the scabbard would help. Check the leather: old and damaged vs. artificially aged, the blade ( too intact for a WWI weapon?) and the handle ( old wood vs. new staining).
99% of bebuts these days are made in India and China. Sorry for the jaded view, but the contemporary market is brutal. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 32
|
![]()
I think original item. M1907 type I.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
Hope you are correct, but how can one be sure without decent pics of the stamps? I, for one, cannot read the inscriptions at all.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 23
|
![]()
These are military issued? And were weapons like this standard issued with these kind of scabbards?
The scabbard looks a bit like a modified and shortened klewang (the Dutch military ones) version. regards |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 32
|
![]()
These were officially issued by Zlatoust (most of them), Izhevsk (bow and arrow mark) and Artinsk russian weapons' factories.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 32
|
![]()
2 Ariel: chinese and indian fakes are very bright and clean, and item's blade has original patina.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
Aging steel blade is a piece of cake, they do it all the time.
You might be 100% right, but - no disrespect ! - I want to see the markings. One thing is already making my antennae twitch: no markings on the upper scabbard fitting. If I were the owner, I'd send good pics to a russian forum: some of these guys are incredibly knowledgeable and frightfully paranoid ( from daily exposure to bitter reality). |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|