Tulwar markings?

capt.smash · 21st May 2005, 05:40 PM

HI guys thanks for the replys

i havent actualy got my hands on this yet i braught it on impulse....however the more i look at it now the more i suspect that it is newer than i thaught...its just seems to prestine ,flawless blade edge no real ware to the inlay on handle...hmmm

.Tom

the blade does seem folded there are definate cold shuts on one side of the blade so i think the blade is functional....here are some aditional pics.What do you think am i a sucker?

Aqtai · 21st May 2005, 05:44 PM

I don't really know much about tulwars, although I have seen them at Militaria fairs. I don't know if it's just the angle at which the photo was taken, but is that blade a bit short?

capt.smash · 21st May 2005, 05:53 PM

I think its just the angle the blade is 28"

derek · 21st May 2005, 07:11 PM

Hi,

Two questions: is the blade sharp, or has it been sharpened at some stage?

Is that a hint of a wootz pattern, or is the pic fooling me?

I've seen easily over 100 "tourist" market swords from Iran and Rajastan, and NONE of them ever had a sharpened blade, and none of them showed a wootz pattern, but nearly always a definite mechanical damascus pattern.

Yours doesn't look like them, at least from your pics. Even the koftgari looks different. It may not be ancient, but looks to be a serviceable fighting sword.

-d

capt.smash · 21st May 2005, 07:25 PM

Hi

im not sure yet how sharp it is as it hasnt arived yet.It was the sugestion of wootz that made me go for it

but now ive looked at the pics again im not optomistic.

M.carter · 21st May 2005, 07:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by derek

Hi,

Two questions: is the blade sharp, or has it been sharpened at some stage?

Is that a hint of a wootz pattern, or is the pic fooling me?

I've seen easily over 100 "tourist" market swords from Iran and Rajastan, and NONE of them ever had a sharpened blade, and none of them showed a wootz pattern, but nearly always a definite mechanical damascus pattern.

Yours doesn't look like them, at least from your pics. Even the koftgari looks different. It may not be ancient, but looks to be a serviceable fighting sword.

-d

I stand to back Dereks post. I've also seen the junk coming out of India lately in Kuwait, most are antiqued and have very loose hilts, and etched on the forte "Made in India". Yours Captain, is certainly not among those. I believe you have a genuine item, I especially like that curve on your sword.

Jim McDougall · 22nd May 2005, 04:36 AM

The markings on the blade of this tulwar are perfectly explained by Rick, and the so called 'sickle' marks are indicative of European trade blades that were often copied by armourers in Afghanistan and Northern India. These are most commonly associated with early Genoan parallel markings that appear to have been adopted by makers in Styria and the Caucusus, among others. It does seem that they occur on most Afghan paluoar blades, at least examples I have seen. The linear multi diamond figure between the toothed semi circles seems atypical of most applications of this marking, but may be embellishment for effect. This marking would have been simply for quality assertion and would not have to do with any armoury markings I have seen.

The three dots or circles have to do with the 'trimurti' and this symbol is key to Hindu as well as Buddhist symbolism, which as Rick has noted, carries rather detailed explanation. The three dot symbol is often seen on tulwar blades, often subtly marked and not usually joined with a 'trade' marking such as the sickle motif seen here.

Looks like a nice example, probably latter 19th century, and the hilt seems to suggest Rajasthan as the elements and motif resemble others I've seen that are said to be from there.

Best regards,
Jim

capt.smash · 22nd May 2005, 12:30 PM

Thanks guys exellent replys,very interesting

Jens Nordlunde · 25th May 2005, 01:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jim McDougall

The three dots or circles have to do with the 'trimurti' and this symbol is key to Hindu as well as Buddhist symbolism, which as Rick has noted, carries rather detailed explanation. The three dot symbol is often seen on tulwar blades, often subtly marked and not usually joined with a 'trade' marking such as the sickle motif seen here.

Best regards,
Jim

I doubt that the three dots represent 'trimurti', I think they must have another meaning. I have never seen them placed like that on a blade, the triangle has been turned a bit. The 'trimurti' is always place just under, and close to the hilt, not half way down the blade.
Have a look at the attached.

Jens

21st May 2005, 05:40 PM	#1
capt.smash Member Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Devon ,England Posts: 80	HI guys thanks for the replys i havent actualy got my hands on this yet i braught it on impulse....however the more i look at it now the more i suspect that it is newer than i thaught...its just seems to prestine ,flawless blade edge no real ware to the inlay on handle...hmmm .Tom the blade does seem folded there are definate cold shuts on one side of the blade so i think the blade is functional....here are some aditional pics.What do you think am i a sucker? Attached Images

21st May 2005, 05:53 PM	#3
capt.smash Member Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Devon ,England Posts: 80	I think its just the angle the blade is 28" Attached Images

21st May 2005, 05:44 PM	#2
Aqtai Member Join Date: May 2005 Location: Merseyside, UK Posts: 222	I don't really know much about tulwars, although I have seen them at Militaria fairs. I don't know if it's just the angle at which the photo was taken, but is that blade a bit short?

21st May 2005, 07:11 PM	#4
derek Member Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 215	Hi, Two questions: is the blade sharp, or has it been sharpened at some stage? Is that a hint of a wootz pattern, or is the pic fooling me? I've seen easily over 100 "tourist" market swords from Iran and Rajastan, and NONE of them ever had a sharpened blade, and none of them showed a wootz pattern, but nearly always a definite mechanical damascus pattern. Yours doesn't look like them, at least from your pics. Even the koftgari looks different. It may not be ancient, but looks to be a serviceable fighting sword. -d

21st May 2005, 07:25 PM	#5
capt.smash Member Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Devon ,England Posts: 80	Hi im not sure yet how sharp it is as it hasnt arived yet.It was the sugestion of wootz that made me go for it but now ive looked at the pics again im not optomistic.

22nd May 2005, 04:36 AM	#7
Jim McDougall Arms Historian Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Route 66 Posts: 10,281	The markings on the blade of this tulwar are perfectly explained by Rick, and the so called 'sickle' marks are indicative of European trade blades that were often copied by armourers in Afghanistan and Northern India. These are most commonly associated with early Genoan parallel markings that appear to have been adopted by makers in Styria and the Caucusus, among others. It does seem that they occur on most Afghan paluoar blades, at least examples I have seen. The linear multi diamond figure between the toothed semi circles seems atypical of most applications of this marking, but may be embellishment for effect. This marking would have been simply for quality assertion and would not have to do with any armoury markings I have seen. The three dots or circles have to do with the 'trimurti' and this symbol is key to Hindu as well as Buddhist symbolism, which as Rick has noted, carries rather detailed explanation. The three dot symbol is often seen on tulwar blades, often subtly marked and not usually joined with a 'trade' marking such as the sickle motif seen here. Looks like a nice example, probably latter 19th century, and the hilt seems to suggest Rajasthan as the elements and motif resemble others I've seen that are said to be from there. Best regards, Jim

22nd May 2005, 12:30 PM	#8
capt.smash Member Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Devon ,England Posts: 80	Thanks guys exellent replys,very interesting