![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,242
|
Hello Ariel,
In the article "Head-Hunting in the Balkans", Durham M. Edith, Man Vol23 (1923):19-21, the author investigates the practice of taking heads in Montenegro at the turn of the 20th century. The Montenegrans are said to cut heats with a "hanzhar", a big knife. I had taken this to mean a khanjar, but that's a stabbing weapon, not slashing. Perhaps "hanzhar" was indeed interchangeable with yataghan. Last edited by Emanuel; 9th August 2009 at 07:03 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 1,738
|
Ariel,
At least in Bulgaria, the terms are not interchangeable, and the yataghan was a lot more popular - all Bulgarian haiduts and revolutionaries had either a yataghan, sometimes a kilidj, almost never a khanjar, based on photos. When it comes to secondary weapons, the karakulaks (a local, smaller version of a yataghan) and kamas were more popular than khanjars. Regards, Teodor |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
In the recent Elgood's book there is a statement that in Albania and Bosnia-Hercegovina yataghans ( long ones, not some anemic knives!) were indeed called Handjars.
And then I looked at Stone.... Same info. Say whatever you want about old George Cameron, but he knew his stuff! We should open him more often. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|