Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 5th May 2005, 10:28 PM   #1
Mark
Member
 
Mark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 987
Default

That is possible. An incorruptable body is considered a sign of holiness in Buddhism (maybe not all sects). I would venture to say that the idea of pre-preserving the body before death grew out of the more basic practice of fasting in order to overcome one's physical nature. A central tenant of Buddhism is that the physical world is false (not evil, just not the true Reality), and a distraction and impediment to one's attaining Nirvana. A major focus of Buddhist asceticism was to divorce one's mind and spirit from the physical needs and sensations of the world, to better focus on and perceive the real, spiritual, world. It is likely that the incorruptability of a body after death is seen perhaps as the ultimate (or very high degree anyway) of triumphs over the physical -- even one's dead body is free of the corrupting influence of the physical world.

And Buddhists don't like swords, oddly enough. And there is no sword visible in this statue. How interesting ... and ethnographic ... and weapon-related. [Deparately trying to keep the thread from spinning COMPLETELY off into the outer reaches of OT-land. ]
Mark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th May 2005, 11:29 PM   #2
tuancd
Member
 
tuancd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Paris - Bruxelles
Posts: 32
Default

Hi guys
Thanks to everybody
here's the translation for those who wanted it
The sentences
> mean " B.E.(the Buddhist Era) 2461, Mr. Nuj and Ms. Jid have
> contributed the buddha image and have dedicated to Ms. Ju.They wish
> she will reach nirvana.
Not much
but there is the date which still needs to be tranfered in JC calendar (any help will be appreciated)
tuancd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th May 2005, 12:40 AM   #3
Ian
Vikingsword Staff
 
Ian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,395
Default

tuancd:

I believe that your B.E. date of 2461 translates to about 1920 A.D. in the Christian Era. That seems rather recent for such a statue, but perhaps not.

Ian.
Ian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th May 2005, 12:28 PM   #4
Mark
Member
 
Mark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 987
Default

2461 BE would be either 1918 or 1917, depending on where you are. Generally one subtracts 544 years, but in some countries (e.g., Thailand) 543 is subtracted. Since this is a Thai piece, it is most likely 1918.
Mark is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.