![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,218
|
![]()
Bill, if you are talking about the barong that the guy all the way on the left is carrying (i assume you are, but it's not actually in his belt, but hung over his shoulder) i would not be willing to pass any judgement on it's age based on this view. It could be new or it might have belonged to his grandfather.
![]() That being said, you are absolutely right. Just because a barong is newly made does not mean that it is not a fully functional weapon. These weapons are still traditionally made in the Philippines. They are not all cheap tourist items. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Upstate New York, USA
Posts: 937
|
![]()
For when the video disappears from the BBC website...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,242
|
![]()
Looks like he's carrying a gayang http://vikingsword.com/vb/showthread.php?t=8261
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 58
|
![]()
it rather resembles to this newly made barongs, i think....
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: East Coast USA
Posts: 3,191
|
![]()
Looks recent to me also with a small blade. You can sever a head with a 9-12" as long as its sharp and is heavy enough but that blade is recently made looks nothing like the older barungs. Btw an weapon could be a janap and not a barung?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,637
|
![]()
I have seen captured swords, barongs and kris, from a friend in the Force Recon of the Filipino Marines.
All of them seems to be late 20th C. Itīs interesting that the one on the picture is a shorter version. The ginunting of the Filipino Marines is also shorter than the one that the instructors of Pekiti-Tirsia Kali got in the 90īs. I was told that the reason why is for it to be easier to carry and that itīs only used for closed quarters. I still prefer the old one that was individually measured for each instructor. Michael |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 264
|
![]() Quote:
http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showpo...7&postcount=28 I also bought a modern day ginunting from Buddy, the smith who makes them for the Filipino Marines. ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,218
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Manila, Phils.
Posts: 1,042
|
![]()
"Rambo" (the one with the M-60) seems to be clutching a blade, but with a shorter hilt ...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Manila, Phils.
Posts: 1,042
|
![]()
By the way, the size of that barung looks like about the same size as the contemporary pira below.
I bought the pira from a local FMA blade instructor, who in turn got it from a Phil. military colonel who served in Basilan. Not sure though if the pira was a capture piece. The pira's overall lt. is 410 mm (16"), and the blade length is 270 mm (10.5") (blade thickness at hilt is 6 mm or 1/4"). The blade's temper line is visible upon close inspection of the pira. My point is that this small size (whether it's a barong or a pira, etc.) appears to be a good size for secondary and back-up purposes. Last edited by migueldiaz; 8th July 2009 at 05:41 AM. Reason: Metric system added |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|