![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,295
|
![]() Quote:
I would agree with the post 1900 date for wire wrap scabbards, it does seem that Chinese swords just as many ethnographic edged weapon forms ,are often remounted and replacement scabbards added. Many of the late Ming blades were remounted in the 19th century in Qing mounts. The 'Manchurian' designation is indeed confusing, and indeed does appear in the 'Seven Stars' catalog as Gavin has noted, actually in two catalogs on the same sabre. It is interesting that the 'Manchu Dao' designator is used only on this example which is the same in form as standard oxtail sabres, the Nui Wei Dao, which is the designation on these same sabres through all other issues of these catalogs I am aware of. The text also typically emphasizes that , "...the niu wei dao is unique in the history of Chinese sabre designs. Unlike all preceding forms of single edged swords in Chinas steel age history, the nui wei dao is the only type not to have been used as a standard weapon of Imperial Troops. In fact it appears the only sabre which seems to have been developed solely for civilian use". (Item #1914, Catalog 19, 1999, Seven Stars) Other entries in these catalogs for nui wei dao, or oxtails, note the civilian use of these, and that they were carried by rebels, martial artists and common men in the last years of the Qing (Manchu) dynasty. There are references to the Boxers (Righteous Fists of Harmony) who supported the Dowager Empress Cixi during the maelstrom of rebellion and chaos taking place 1898-1901. The Daoist martial art known as Ba Gwa Zhang (Eight Trigrams Palm) was little known until brought to Beijing in the 19th century by Dung Halchuant, and the 'oxtail' with huge blade was favored in 'Ba Gwa' style. (ref: Seven Stars Cat. 14 1997, #1430). Perhaps these set the pace for the popularity of these huge bladed sabres in the martial artist and civilian sector. It does seem possible that despite civilian designation, these may have been also used by the irregular units or militia attached to the Qing military. The references specify these were not used by 'Imperial' troops, which of course excludes these type units I would think. Cat. 15 (1997) notes that Nui Wei Dao of high quality were made at the famed Longquan in Zheijiang Province (the location of the original seven wells arranged in formation of the seven stars of the bear constellation), and these oxtails were "...prized by martial artists and military men across China". This note suggests that some sort of use may have existed, but most likely in the irregular units noted. My question has been, why would the Manchu designation and style have been used by martial artists, who seem to me have typically been associated with the well known secret societies in China who despised the Manchu of the Qing dynasty. Perhaps the term derived from these sabres used by militia type forces for the Qing, and became favored with thier powerful blades easy to use by relatively untrained civilians, and remarkably deadly in the hands of martial artists. Just some thoughts on the term and use of these fascinating swords, All the best, Jim |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 407
|
![]()
I think niuweidao is the general term for the many broad bladed, sabers with a raised yelman, while "manchu dao" may be more of a collectors term. Manchu dao are certainly a recognizable subset of the oxtail style, and the scabbards are similar to Qing regulation scabbards for the willow leaf swords of the regular army. It is not wild speculation to suppose that there were regular militia under Manchu control that used these swords. Nevertheless, until a militia regulation manual terns up, I will put this term with other collector’s terms for recognizable types, such as the Qijiadao, that may have some historical basis, but are unsubstantiated.
Just for reference, here are some niuweidao that are not of the "Manchu dao" type, mixed with some other civilian dao. http://i77.photobucket.com/albums/j6...i/DSC_1053.jpg http://i77.photobucket.com/albums/j6...duation357.jpg Josh |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Kaboejoetan Galoenggoeng Mélben
Posts: 472
|
![]()
Hullo everybody,
While the topic is still current, I thought I'd post these pix (sorry for the poor quality). Is this the genuine article, or merely a wall hanger? Thank you. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 407
|
![]()
As I have said many times, it is difficult for me to date late pieces in good condition. Nevertheless, because no one else has tried, I will say these are probably late Republican. Many such blades copy earlier things, and may have artificial patination to make them look older. Look for signs of real age, including a chipping or wearing away of any artificial patina.
I see late examples to still be "real" if they have a good steel blade. The pattern welded ones are obviously nice, but some mono-steel ones were also made with quality. Josh |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Kaboejoetan Galoenggoeng Mélben
Posts: 472
|
![]()
Hullo everybody,
Thanks Josh! Best, |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|