![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |||||
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]()
Hello Michael,
Quote:
![]() ![]() Quote:
Quote:
Now, was the name originally applied/stated by the Lampung owner, a Sumatran runner, or a seller (say, in Singapore)? Quote:
Quote:
I have only found scattered bits and pieces in the primary accounts (Volz, etc.). Most ethnographic research expeditions with reasonably documented, surviving pieces were done in the late 19th to early 20th century. Finding well documented pieces from the 1st half of the 19th c. or earlier is tough for most types of blades. I'd also posit that there was a bias towards larger or more decorated pieces in the early collecting days (e. g. shown by the European curiosity collections which later evolved into ethnographic research collections). Regards, Kai |
|||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,637
|
![]()
Hello Kai,
Try Google Scholar for lots of articles and references on the curved knives of all ages and places. It seems like the simpler one, were the blade was set 90 degrees on the center of a palm stick, was an earlier rice reaping knife than the korambi. On the name game I don't really get it. How can Kuku Rimau, that both of us has seen in local use and which has a logical description of the object, risk to be a nonsense label? Michael |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|