Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 6th April 2009, 04:09 AM   #1
fearn
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,247
Default

Hi All,

I think we've chewed on this question before, Here and Here

Basically, I'm not sure it's a diffusion thing entirely.

For one thing, the problem with an open sheath is that it has to fit the blade fairly well, because otherwise, a double-beveled blade can turn and potentially cut its way out where the front binding hits the wooden back. The simple solution for this is to have a single-beveled edge, with the long, flat side against the back of the open scabbard. That way, even if the blade twists in the scabbard, the edge can't get to a position where it will cut its way out the open face bindings.

That said, why would you want it open? Couple of potential reasons. One is that the local climate is really rainy. If keeping the blade dry is impossible, then keeping it open may be good, because it will drain fast, and the state of the blade can be checked quickly, and rust cleaned off. (Thanks for making this point first dennee).

A second reason to keep it open is that it shows off how much steel you have. In places (like Assam) where steel isn't too common, flashing a blade may be a way of showing ones wealth.

Note that these aren't universal rules, as plenty of people who live in rainy climates have closed scabbards. However, a single bevel does go with the open sheath, because it fits better.

Best,

F
fearn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th April 2009, 07:42 AM   #2
KuKulzA28
Member
 
KuKulzA28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: between work and sleep
Posts: 731
Default

Thanks, that's very interesting...
so maybe single-bevels and open sheaths went hand in-hand... but a single bevel does not necessarily mean an open sheath (Talibon?) but an open sheath makes for a single-bevel to be ideal?

Would there be any good way to figure out if it was diffusion, isolated innovation or a mix of both?
KuKulzA28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th April 2009, 03:45 AM   #3
fearn
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,247
Default

Let's see: hills of Assam, parts of the Philippines, and Taiwan, especially in the highlands....

I could sort of believe that there was diffusion, but not really. Mostly these show up among the highlanders (although I'm not sure about all the Philippine tribes--comments?). These aren't exactly people who talk with each other a lot (yes, I'm stereotyping, sorry).

A counter example is the sai/tjabang, which shows up all over Indonesia, coastal China, up to Okinawa. There are lots of local variations, but it's pretty obvious that sailors carried them all up and down the major trade routes.

That, and the swords in question all look different and are built differently. Actually, the open-work scabbards are different too. Sometimes the opening is bridged by braided rattan (Assam, Philippines), sometimes by metal staples (Taiwan), sometimes with wood (Bhutan).

F
fearn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th April 2009, 06:13 AM   #4
KuKulzA28
Member
 
KuKulzA28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: between work and sleep
Posts: 731
Default

Ah, good points, convergent evolution of blade-scabbard builds?

Still there was trade in Taiwan, Philippines, and Assam, but I see what you mean, the knives and sheaths are all distinct.
KuKulzA28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.