![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 227
|
![]()
...it's peened and rounded off very smoothly. It's possible to see the circular end of the tang in the centre of the pommel - which is rather like a brazil nut pommel. No visible markings, signs of old sharpening. What do you mean by "walls"?
Last edited by stephen wood; 6th February 2009 at 11:48 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,281
|
![]()
This is probably one of the most unusual Moroccan sa'if ('nimchas') I have seen, in its very workmanlike appearance. That is, it is almost a nimcha produced industrially, by the numbers. The entire piece is rather undimensional, and appears to have been produced in a munitions sense. The guard being welded to the blade would make the sword quite unservicable, that is unable to undergo repairs or alterations. These swords were typically hilted locally and indeed using European blades. There is a possibility of this being a theatrical piece I would imagine, as it would present the appearance of a Moroccan sa'if, though without the unmistakeable craftsmanship usually seen in these hilts.
The long ricasso, and square blocked channels or fullers are atypical of any blades I have ever seen, they usually are rounded as the tool is withdrawn from the blade. A most interesting anomaly, and look forward to hearing if anyone else has seen anything like this. All best regards, Jim |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 1,664
|
![]()
Could it simply be missing the hilt? It is not unimaginable that a horn hilt may have broken into several pieces, especially if it was rhino and somebody wanted the material for another use (say, Chinese traditional medicine).
Regards, Teodor |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 227
|
![]()
...yes, I'm sure that it originally had a grip. It does seem rather old - it has an archaic feel to it. The grip must have simply broken or fell apart.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kent
Posts: 2,658
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 227
|
![]()
...yes it does. I understand that the Maghreb examples have more substantial iron/steel guards. Did I mention evidence of sharpening?
I wonder if this gentleman has been posted here before? Last edited by stephen wood; 7th February 2009 at 11:27 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,281
|
![]() Quote:
Dont recall if this has been posted before, but its a great illustration! Interesting noting the 17th century attribution also...reveals how early this well established hilt form has been around. A great deal of pride and certain affection went into fashioning these hilts by Maghreb armourers, and even the simpler hilts reflected skilled workmanship. It is also interesting to note that the 'nimcha' was even known in England in these times, and wealthy merchants and nobles had acquired these in some cases in trade with Maghreb ports. This contact was not without issue, as it is known that 'Barbary Pirates' raided as far as the English coast and of course even farther north. Thanks for noting the sharpening.....that would hopefully eliminate the theatrical suggestion I had noted ![]() All best regards, Jim |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 227
|
![]() ![]() Last edited by stephen wood; 7th February 2009 at 02:28 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|