![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 373
|
![]()
Ariel, I think that the large grips were to protect the koftgari designs between the hilt slabs. Only a fine lines remain, if at all on this one. So this one may have had slabs changed at some time. The only other rational for the large grips as with the bali keris hilts for show at court.
Regards, Steve |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 637
|
![]()
Ariel is right, bigger grips = Central Asia. Those guys were and are physically larger than most and larger grips give a better grip for a downward thrust.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 131
|
![]()
You guys have any similar examples with grips like this? Screams composite to me, maybe old composite, but nonetheless-
The grip-to-ricasso area just looks silly and I've got to think those thick grips are impractical. Horn looks to have age though, lovely blade.... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 936
|
![]()
The grips are not unusual. Here're similarly shaped: http://www.oriental-arms.com/photos.php?id=274
Agree with Ariel and Ward - Central Asian, perhaps Buharan or other ...stan countries. I have very similar dagger with large horn grips, and the hold is quite comfortable even for my small hands:-). The blade is very nice indeed, Steve. The ladder pattern is rare on daggers, and yours is of good quality. My guess would be that the blade is older than the rest, and the chiseling is fairly recent, and not contemporary with the blade. Here is example of 18th century Persian chiseling, note the difference in quality. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|