![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,725
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Is it common (or significant) for the tang to be devoid of marks? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: comfortably at home, USA
Posts: 432
|
![]()
Yes, quite common for blades (of all eras) to be unsigned. About half of my
collection is composed of mumei (unsigned) blades. It may (?) by possible if the blade was in better condition to make a guess as to the school or even the smith. But again that requires someone much more knowledgeable than I; in hand inspection and the blade in good polish. There were a variety of reasons why blades were unsigned. For some smiths it was considered improper to sign them; for others they didn't sign because they felt it wasn't their better work; many blades have been shortened over the years and the signatures cut off. Rich S |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Heidelberg, Germany
Posts: 183
|
![]()
I agree that the quality of the horimono is quite low. Maybe you could show a few more pics of the blade and the tang.
Peter |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,725
|
![]()
More pics:
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|