![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
Exactly right! The market favors cheap stuff.
I would guess that 99% of amateur martial artists buy cheap but functional replicas made in Taiwan, China etc and do not care about any preservation issues. A tiny fraction of high-class martial arts afficionados buy custom made blades and even smaller fraction collects the real stuff. All of them train with wooden/bamboo/plastic sticks being concerned about the safety of both the weapon and the opponent. Thus, the entire demand for martial arts swords of whatever kind can be satisfied with a single mass-production outfit. Indians can do it now but the Chinese will take over in no time. And that is the end of the tradition, whether we like it or not. Such an outcome does not make me unhappy since I collect only real stuff. I know that many people will be very sad and I sympathize with them. No offence meant but to each his own. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 987
|
![]()
My hope would be that the sword would return as a status symbol, and/or as a symbol of the connection and appreciation of heritage, in those areas where currently it is not so viewed. I think that the status of the keris in Malaysia is a good example of how a smithing tradition can retain relevance in the modern age. And of course, the nihonto enjoys a similar place in the culture of Japan, but that is what started this discussion.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Houston, TX, USA
Posts: 1,254
|
![]()
Actually, I think it is the third world that still has the skills. The problem with the overculture, or why swords are "dead" in it, is that it, as a social tenet, considers them dead, considers closerange weapons barbaric, obsolete (this is not always a logical value judgement; they're not technical/magical enough to be nobsolete to the overculture), and primitive, thus it has a force of disarmament toward edged weapons (in addition to its general force of personal disarmament) that tends to quash the market (growing, living, but certainly not what it was 300, 400 years ago, at least relative to populations....), while it's workers are typically (this is insidious, too, IMHO) and increasingly highly specialized, and while highly skilled in the standard practices of their specialties, are discouraged (by market forces) from imaginativeness and from fanatical craftsmanship, and also, are intrinsically isolated from other skills. And the skills, abilities, and lore (knowledge) of making (using) quality swords is not one of the highly valued/often highly paid feilds in said culture, so it exists, and will exist partly/largely as what FC called a "surrogate activity"; the best work and ideas and discoveries and artisans will intrinsically come out of the hobby feild; the amateurs, who work for love, not money. Thus, for instance, it may well be that the only people building truly quality ship models now are people with sharp knives and tiny saws who love it so much they make the whole thing up out of some wood.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Macau
Posts: 294
|
![]()
Gentlemen,
I feel so happy to be in this Forum. ![]() You all are wonderful people each one very unique. I threw in this theme and have been following it as close as possible. Not intervening is not lack of interest but viewing and thinking. I would think that on such topics there are the first issues that are what we call in Portuguese as breaking the stone, which is brainstorming. Then I guess we should go into analysing the issues, which is actually putting forth different scenarios with different measures as much as possible native to the context. Later it would be time to sumarize everything by discussing how to come up with ideas for measures or just simply conclude there are no measures to be taken... Shall we proceed? ![]() Thank you all. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Houston, TX, USA
Posts: 1,254
|
![]() Quote:
Last edited by tom hyle; 12th April 2005 at 02:35 PM. Reason: clarity |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Macau
Posts: 294
|
![]() Quote:
Actually I am convinced that the region of Long Quan was the craddle to Chinese steel swords. It would be of great interest to study Chinese swords, not in books but in physical terms, for the jia-gang (sandwiched steel) and other forms existed in China. Why it has not been kept so alive is something I am still to understand in depth. However I may found a natural-cultural reason. The Chinese were not expansionists by nature.Their concept of Zhong Guo (The Middle Kingdom) was much more important. Only the Yuan Dynasty and Qin (Ching) Dynasty were respectively Mongol and Manchu, perhaps a reason that the self enclosure did not rely on any paramount legend about the sword. Overculture, on another aspect of your post, seems to be unstoppable. Uniformization is the word of the day which carries benefits, if we see it as a way (not being carried out) to redistribute wealth to the less developped countries (which is more utopic then doable in a willing way). But it does have these lost things. The issue in the end is that the overculture is so full of its political righteousness that it is like a tsunami... ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,365
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 987
|
![]()
I was searching posts on the old forum and re-discovered Dan's post about his visit to Lung Som in Aranyik. Among other things, Dan writes:
Quote:
The full thread is here: http://www.vikingsword.com/ubb/Forum1/HTML/002324.html |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 655
|
![]()
I'm sorry for being a little bit overly pessimistic about ship modeling - I'm sure it's alive, just like sword making in America is also quite alive. And most likely the needed for personal interaction with a master/good marketing will prevent complete outsourcing of this and sword making industries.
However the market share did move and does move drastically from individually hand made items to the semi-mass produced ones, leaving very few in the business. Concerning the anti-sword attitudes - I believe the sheer number of "samurai swords" sold every year is enough to recreate Sekigahara. Under every tree you can find a sensei teaching secrets of ninjutsu. Does it transform into buying traditionally made swords ? Hell no. At best it goes to Paul Chen and his cuties. The reasons in my opinion are as follows: a. There is no need for expensive real thing when something mass produced cuts (not exactly as well as the real thing). b. With a mass produced thing you get a sword stand, cool dragon on your tsuka, and the certificate that tells you that this is a Masamune's sword. c. Modern traditionally made swords are very often worse in quality than similarly priced antique swords. In short, we are all going Kubachi's road - bad blades in all silver scabbards. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Macau
Posts: 294
|
![]() Quote:
![]() If you didn't revive it, I wouldn't ever be able to view it. Lung Som may have the commercial side to support his other artistic lines. But the fact was that my own reaction when I was there was that I found the bowies to be too expensive and ended up feeling a bit awkward for not seeing only dhas. I could understand the commercial part, but I don't know, I wasn't convinced. But maybe I'm too picky. ![]() In was wondering how are those swords that Dan ordered. Not long ago, Dan still mentioned he had not received anything. This is the part that can scare away customers, for Asia is known to usually be very fast at doing things. Cheers ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Macau
Posts: 294
|
![]() Quote:
I fully understand. I myself love those moro keris. Let us hope positions do not get more intransigent. Peace should be the most easy thing in the world to achieve. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|