30th October 2008, 05:58 PM | #31 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Manila, Phils.
Posts: 1,042
|
Quote:
|
|
30th October 2008, 07:53 PM | #32 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kent
Posts: 2,653
|
Quote:
Non….le champagne est pour les vainqueurs Regards David |
|
31st October 2008, 01:10 AM | #33 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Manila, Phils.
Posts: 1,042
|
Quote:
My reply -- In English: "Ah, yes. But of course." [said in a thick British accent] In French: "Mais oui... évidemment... c'est bęte comme question." [and that is being said in the same lighthearted tone] Thanks to you and the rest for making this thread quite interesting! Best regards. |
|
31st October 2008, 03:00 PM | #34 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Manila, Phils.
Posts: 1,042
|
Quote:
Same here, sir. And I definitely agree with the insights you shared. Thanks for sharing and regards. |
|
31st October 2008, 05:22 PM | #35 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kent
Posts: 2,653
|
A true indicator of the problems of heat and armour would be the solutions the crusaders utilized whilst on campaign.
Some sources state that the Saracens used a form of surcoat that covered the armour, a reasonably loose garment, of light coloured material which helped to reflect some of the sun's heat. This would also help trap an insulating layer of cooler air between the surcoat and armour. This was soon adopted by the crusaders, whom introduced it to Europe after the 1st crusade. Helmets also evolved the visor, which could be raised quickly to survey the battle ......release heat.....or to improve breathing and quickly 'dropped' again. This was a necessary but dangerous practice.....skilled archers were always looking for raised visors so that they could target the face Regards David |
|
|