![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 327
|
![]()
Thinking about it, I wouldn't rule out this being the original hilt. While not a exact match, Moro Swords/Cato has examples in fig. 37 & 47, neither which is the norm, but Moro Swords have a tendency to break the norm.
There is definitely a possibility that the hilt was a trade piece, carved else where & ended up in the markets of the PI. The sword & the hilt both have age & appear to have been around together for a long time. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 159
|
![]()
Can it be a borneo(Kalimantan) Keris? Some of then look like moro keris but they are not.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,339
|
![]()
More like it's a recently married piece; the kris has a rectangular tang and the Madura hilt has been modified to fit .
Much too out of character to be a Moro modification . |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]()
The bone hilt is resembling Madura style but low quality work - can't be very old. I'd guess that the Moro kris blade ended up in Indonesia and got refitted for selling purposes.
The blade is old and quite worn (mid 19th c.?) and comes from Mindanao. How long is it? Regards, Kai |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,218
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,218
|
![]()
Oh, and since this really is a Moro piece i am going to ship this thread over to the main forum for discussion.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 401
|
![]()
IMHO, this is a recent made copy by Madurese of the Filipino kris / Malay Sundang ........ I've seen a few like this one in Kuala Lumpur
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 327
|
![]()
Well the consensus is that it's a recently matched piece.
I have little doubt the blade is 19thC. The file work on the guard suggests it may be even be mid 19C. IMO, Malay sundangs generally have a slight tapper to the blade. This one has broad blade (suggesting Moro) for slashing & likely was made to attach stirrups. It may well have once had stirrups but the photos I see don't determine, one way or another, that it once had or never did. One would suspect that if did have for any length of time the metal underneath would have distinct visible signs of different exposure/wear. Wood surfaces darken with age, the deeper you plane a old board, the lighter it gets. While it may never look like fresh lumber, each swipe of the plane will lighten the wood. Agree that photos can easily show distortion of colors, but those pics suggest to me that wood was carved a long time ago. The entire hilt (wood/metal/bone) shows age. If it was artificially aged, they did a great job. Once again it would be interesting to see the tang. This one is off center, which is not uncommon for Moro blades. It would appear this tang might have a more narrow rectangular shape. If it showed recent filing to fit the hilt, it would pretty much tell the story. But from a the tangs I've examined, they do vary quite a bit & a narrow/longer tang on a old blade would be the norm. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|