![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PR, USA
Posts: 679
|
![]()
What about the screwed pommels and knuckleguards? Did the 1748 have them?
I did notice a certain difference between the two I own, the shape of the quillons, the depth and width of the fuller, and the width and length of the blades... Sorry to bother you so much! : ). Best M |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 182
|
![]()
The m/1748 had the knuckleguard screwed to the pommel, yes.
And as for all the questions, I'm just glad that I can be of some help. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PR, USA
Posts: 679
|
![]()
Hi Kisak,
I have a sword identical to the "broken saber" in your picture. What's its ID..? Best Manuel |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 182
|
![]()
The pictures are from the Army Museum in Stockholm, and according to them it's an m/1775-1807 for troopers at Savolax' light infantry regiment. It's a "modification model", where the inner guards on the old m/1775 sabers were ground off to reduce wear&tear on the uniforms. The m/1775 in turn seems to be identical to the m/1770 for Savolax' jaegers on foot.
You can get a better look at an m/1770 or m/1775 here: http://www.auktionsverket.se/dbkatal...007-12-10&anr= |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|