![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,725
|
![]()
As always, it's difficult to speak with any certainty from pics on the 'net, but I highly doubt that blade is original to the hilt.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,336
|
![]()
What I see here is a spear blade with the base and tang ground away and reshaped to a fat thick point .
The 'original' point of the spear is mounted in the hilt and the reshaped base is now the busniess end . ![]() Married piece IMO . Just saying ...... ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kent
Posts: 2,658
|
![]()
Thank you all for your input
![]() The use of the small Dhal was very common, and many sword techniques were learnt in conjunction with the Dhal. It is not unlikely that some warriors could have substuted the small shield for a 'short' sword. Two sworded martial arts are not uncommon in Asia, the abillity to use 'attack' as a form of defence and the blades shortness for close quarter combat ...is, I feel...quite possible. Regards David |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,194
|
![]()
Well thought out assessment David! and I am inclined to agree, this was definitely put together to be used. I'm still curious about the blade, and the distinct raised central ridge reminds me of an earlier native khanda blade that has been ground down to fit the much smaller opening in the hilt. This reminds me of the rapier blade khandas.
The idea of a spear blade that Rick suggested seems plausible also, and again the section recalls the Maasai spear. All the best, Jim |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,336
|
![]()
I think we might want to consider whether or not the hilt configuration would allow proper wrist movement for use as a main gauche .
IIRC in another thread we discussed the limiting of certain movements by the disc pommel . ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kent
Posts: 2,658
|
![]()
Hi Jim,
thank you for your comments ![]() Hi Rick ![]() I am inclined to agree that the disc pommel would limit wrist movement, perhaps less so for an Indian warrior if the 'smaller hand theory' is correct. I did / do not think that the European style of sword use would have been adopted ... I think likely 'adapted'. I used the term 'main gauche' as a sort of European equivalent...but the technique of use, I believe, would be different. I am working on the assumption that this was made for a particular 'function' ....and it seems to 'fit the bill' as some sort of parrying 'sword', although, of course, there are other possible uses. Kind Regards David |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 637
|
![]()
when it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, then it is a duck. This is a marriage and not a good one. I have seen locals banging these items together for resale. If it had been done in period it would at least be more functional.
Last edited by ward; 4th August 2008 at 07:46 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|