|
|
|
23rd July 2008, 11:03 PM
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 119
|
now that i have mine, pictures should be forthcomming
|
|
|
|
24th July 2008, 04:32 PM
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 227
|
...many thanks for your help.
when it arrives I will post more images and dimensions. Presumably the index finger was looped over the quillon? |
|
|
|
|
24th July 2008, 04:34 PM
|
#3 | |
|
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,339
|
Quote:
 
|
|
|
|
|
|
24th July 2008, 06:40 PM
|
#4 | |
|
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,282
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
24th July 2008, 06:56 PM
|
#5 |
|
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,339
|
 I think we came to the conclusion that the Indian style of swordsmanship dictated no fingering of the quillon .  I am a forgetful old man so all bets are off on this being correct . 
|
|
|
|
|
24th July 2008, 07:10 PM
|
#6 | |
|
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
Quote:
The age part frightens me ... i'm only half year "younger" 
|
|
|
|
|
|
24th July 2008, 07:48 PM
|
#7 | |
|
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,339
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
24th July 2008, 07:11 PM
|
#8 | |
|
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
