![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 987
|
![]() Quote:
![]() This is indeed a Shan style, and the handle is one of the typical forms, so it has not been re-shaped. Saying it is "Shan" is not a very precise geographic designator, though, as the people called Shan by the Bama (Burmese), but who refer to themselves as Tai or Tai Yuan, live in a area covering parts of Burma, Thailand, Yunnan, and Laos, and I am not sure whether this particular style is favored in a particular sub-zone of this area. They are certainly commonly found in Burma, so I think that it is safe to say that they are used at least by the Burma Shan, and it is my working assumption that this is a style favored in the western areas of Tai territory. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]()
Excelent. I am much obliged to these Forum "dhafiosi" for their coments and info ... if i am allowed the expression
![]() Here is the blade after some cleaning. While i handled it, i felt that its edge is rather sharp and can easily cut. ... The metal is not so humble as i first thaught; instead of soft iron, it appears to have some temper. Mark, is it nonsense to say that this specimen has some similarity with #60 and #61 of The Dha Research index, specially the silver work ? Thanks again Fernando |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|