![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]()
Hello Bill,
Quote:
Regards, Kai |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 327
|
![]()
Kai, Sorry but the picture doesn't show my point well. I'm not set up for pics right now & added this one as a after-thought to my post (I had it on disk). There is a faint line on the pic (very strong on visual expection) about 5 cm from the hilt. The outer darkness stays the same on both sides of the line but the inner core has noticable differences in the lamination. That is the line, that may be a quench line. I assume the smith started by making a straight sword, adding the waves after. Would he use constant quenching to keep previous "waves" from being distorted as he preceded? Kris generally keep a very sharp edge, this one is even sharper then the usual, another reason it may have a unusual quench "marking"?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 407
|
![]()
I have seen a lighter area at the forte of a blade on a Chinese dao that Philip Tom attributed to annealing. The idea was to reheat the base of the blade and let it cool slowly to increase durability at the expense of hardness in an area where hardness is not as important. This is not a comment on the underlying pattern of the steel, but the lighter area at the base of the blade looks almost exactly like what I saw on the dao.
Josh |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Italia
Posts: 1,243
|
![]()
Thank you guys
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Italia
Posts: 1,243
|
![]()
Well, since I will not have the time in the next few days to re-polish and re etch the blade I have a more close look at the blade: in on side there are three (maybe four) clear rows that comes from the gangya area untill the point in the middle portion of the blade (the center). On the other side these rows are clear but I can see also some other thinner lines (the others in the center of the blade are 0.6 mm circa of width). In the pictures you can see a photo taken before of the etching: there are some strange, how can I say, "cracks" on the blade....
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | ||
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]()
Hello Flavio,
Quote:
![]() Quote:
Regards, Kai |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]()
Hello Josh,
Quote:
The only other explanation which comes to my mind would be quenching almost the whole blade in some fluid... Regards, Kai |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]()
Hello Bill,
Quote:
Actually, I'm still having a hard time to locate that line - I'd appreciate a close-up whenever you find some time to take pics. ![]() Regards, Kai |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Italia
Posts: 1,243
|
![]()
Hi all!! Well I was so curoius that I can't wait: I have tried but don't seems to be twisted core..... I'm so sorry, I was hoping.... Anyway I haven't taken pictures because it wasn't worth. I have polished and etched twice one side of the blade, one time with cloruric ferric and than with lemon, but nothing. Anyway I will try again on the whole blade with vinegar.... The last chance
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]()
Hello Flavio,
Quote:
Please do take close-ups of the blade at each step! Even it may not look pretty there may be more hints on this blade. If these suggest twist core and the blade is just difficult to stain, this may be worth handing over to Philip Tom. Regards, Kai |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 407
|
![]()
I agree, those forge lines on the blade really look like evidence of twist core. Just because you can't get it to show up don't give up hope. Some patterns will show up for anyone, and some take more expert care.
Josh |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Italia
Posts: 1,243
|
![]()
Hi Josh, hi Kai! you guys are right: I will try again, but could be that I will not able to bring out the pattern
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|