![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]()
Hello Michael,
Quote:
Does the horn show the rhino microstructure? I'd have guessed at aged carabao from the pics but you can verify with a magnifying glass... ![]() Regards, Kai |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Witness Protection Program
Posts: 1,730
|
![]()
michael,
it's really hard to say where it's from. i could guess, but what's the point? this class of swords has been the brown belt sudoku version of the filipino sundangs, or indos for that matter. the jury is still out on this one. like kai said; u sure it's rhino??? ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,637
|
![]()
Hi Kai and Ron,
I only do blackbelt Sudoku boards so that's why I would like to give it a try. ![]() Riddles are supposed to be solved. So far two forum members has mailed me that they think the last one could be from Bicol. The only thing I am sure on is that it isn't from Borneo, an area where I feel more comfortable having an opinion about the different sword variations. And that none of the bolos in this thread are Malay Parang Nabur. On the rhino hilt I don't have the bolo around at the moment. But Fred, who most of you probably know, described it as rhino when he sold it to me. I assume he has some experience in evaluating this? But I also found it strange and will have a closer look at it later this week. I suggest we ignore that part and focus on the hilt and blade. Does anyone have any bolo from Bicol that resembles this one? Michael |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Kansas City, MO USA
Posts: 312
|
![]()
Michael,
The second "Parang Nabur" that you posted... does the hilt appear to have been replaced? The "style" seems a bit different. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,637
|
![]() Quote:
I don't have the bolo here at the moment. Only the pictures of it in my computer. What specifically do you want me to check? Michael |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,396
|
![]()
Michael:
I was hoping that some of our Visayan experts would comment on swords of this style, but they have been quiet for some time and it appears that they're not going to reply to your questions. A Visayan attribution seems unlikely for a couple of reasons. The bat or dog head pommel is not a typical Visayan form (at least not in this representation) -- more commonly seen in S. Luzon (e.g., Batangas). The full length, peened over tang is an unusual construction in the Visayas -- more typical of Luzon. The short octagonal ferrule is more typical of Batangas than Visayas, although that is not a strong distinction IMO. The V-ground blade (rather than a chisel-grind) is unusual in the Visayas -- more common in Luzon and elsewhere. The scabbard has some general features of a Visayan scabbarb, especially from the eastern areas -- the drilled-through "hanger" being common -- but again the style and carving are dissimilar from most Visayan work. Erik has suggested a Batangas origin. I think S. Luzon is a good guess, and Batangas is one area that deserves consideration. Another is the Bicol region, and it seems that some suggestions about that area have also been offered to you. If this sword is from the Philippines, and I think it is, then S. Luzon would fit most closely. Batangas or Bicol? I can't take it any further than that I'm afraid. But Visayas seems unlikely. Ian. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,637
|
![]()
Ian,
Thanks for your comments and sharing your experience! Michael |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Kansas City, MO USA
Posts: 312
|
![]() Quote:
Carefully look at your original sword (D-guard clam shell) and my sword... at the hilts. Also look at the one like yours in the Madrid Museum. The details are amazingly similar. Look at how they are peened. Look at the second example that you posted... the detail of the face are a bit more crude (it does not show the same level of craftsmanship)... the peen appears to be a redo. I have seen "modern" Luzon peens that are done the same way, but none of the "original" examples (of this type sword) look like this. But I can not hold the sword in my hand to tell for 100% certain. It is possible that the original hilt was damaged and replaced... which is not a real big deal if true. It is still a great sword! ![]() Also check to see, what is the hilt made from (it should be horn)... |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Kansas City, MO USA
Posts: 312
|
![]()
Can we agree to call this sword a Parang Nabur?
This is how the Spanish identified it in the Museum... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|