![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: East Coast USA
Posts: 3,191
|
![]()
Jens
The silver hilted one has a sun burst or flower type design the other tulwar I can't quite remember right now I will take a few close ups of the hilt. The tulwar with the deep stuck stamps has no riccasso. Lew |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,718
|
![]()
Yes i know Lew, almost like this one.
Don't you have any more comments to my questions? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: East Coast USA
Posts: 3,191
|
![]() Quote:
The fluted hilt seems to be silver overlay. What is the significance of the blade having or not having a riccasso? The top sword is not wootz but it does seem to have an inserted edge so it must be some type of lamination? Lew |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,718
|
![]()
Lew,
Are you sure the fluted hilt is not made of silver? Have you tried with a magnet? It could be silver plated, but then again, it could be of silver. Most Indian made blades have a ricasso, often it is said, that blades without a ricasso are European – I doubt that, as I think some of them are Indian made as well, maybe copied from European blades, but still Indian. Interesting also, as some claim that the reason for the ricasso was, that the Indians used to have their index finger curled around the quillon, to give better room for the other fingers, and to have a better grip. I find it hard to convince myself of this theory, but these blades could have been made in other places, and been exported to India. They did make blades of softer steel and insert an edge of hard steel, so maybe yours is one of these. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: East Coast USA
Posts: 3,191
|
![]()
Jens
Here are some close ups of the hilts. Lew |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,718
|
![]()
Lew,
Thank you for the pictures. The one with the gold decoration looks old. The first mark looks like a letter and a number to me, and the second mark, the eyelashes are made in a way, which I have never seen before. It looks very primitive, but there is no doubt what the meaning was. This is interesting, as the eyelashes were said to be a copy of a European sword mark, and maybe it was, but why then mark the blade as it is on yours, as this mark would fool no one. No one would take it for being a European blade mark, so maybe the eyelashes with the dots can have more than one meaning. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: in my study
Posts: 18
|
![]()
very nice imo
![]() Would love to have something like it. Nice patterns as well. But the tang on the second sword, lookks kind of thin in accordance with the blade? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: South of Germany
Posts: 8
|
![]() Quote:
I'm not sure on the "european eyelash" mark but I "guess" - and that is really what I'm doing - that this symbol / decoration was used in a hinduistic context as well. Please find attached the decoration on one of my kukris (2nd part of the 19th cent. is my guess). Please also note that the lashes ar on the inside. Best regards Andreas Volk |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|