![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Kernersville, NC, USA
Posts: 793
|
![]()
Philip, Unfortunately, one word is the extent of my Bhutanese.
![]() Thanks so much for the correct terminolgy of the Tibetan sword. I much prefer to use the words that the people of the region would use. Steve |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 372
|
![]()
Hi Bill
it is interesting to note the similarities in the guard, the collar throat and the handle between your piece and the more common Butanese daggers like the one attached. drd |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: College Park, MD
Posts: 186
|
![]()
Bill, an interesting sword. I'm jealous. I think the most interesting things are the differences from the most common patags. First, the inlay seems uncommon. While the milled or reeded (brass?) band at the base of the hilt is typical, the way the characteristically octagonal-section grip swells there, with "shoulders" parallel to the blade, is indeed more like some knives than the typical grip with a convex curve all around. The pommel is unusual in its simplicity compared to many I have seen (although I have one that has a simple, octagonal nickel-silver cap), as many swords have the typical pierced-work "gubor." It resembles some simple, southeastern Tibetan steel pommels in a general hexagonal shape and in the provision of two small holes through which to pass a thong or lanyard.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|