![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,854
|
![]()
I took this sword to a military sword buff and he said it is 100% Indian manufacture just a copy hilt. it also appears that the grip is not wood or leather as on the British swords. What ever it is it is hard and in parts there seems to be something like a grain structure. Could it be stained ivory? That seems rather extravagant but in the late 19th early 20th cent it was used with gay abandon. I am not sure if it is safe to speak like that these days
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 3
|
![]()
Hello, I realise this quite an old thread, but I have just come into possession of the exact same sword and wondered if anyone knew the history of the one in this thread
Thanks |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,396
|
![]()
Welcome to the forum, donaghy77.
More pictures of this sword would be helpful I think. Ian Last edited by Ian; 29th October 2017 at 08:36 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,281
|
![]()
This was a wonderful thread and good to see it up again,
the M1853 was indeed used as a select pattern for certain units. The Wilkinson Latham book lists these in its survey of chosen types for the units. It is a shame that Mr. Wilkinson Latham has dropped out of the forum scene as SFI has gone defunct. There is no doubt there are others of this India made pattern out there and he would know of them. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 3
|
![]()
Ian
I have just worked out how to add pictures, poor show when a lot of my job involves IT, I hope you like them, I have spoken to Jim who has been brilliant with bringing his encyclopaedic knowledge to bear |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 548
|
![]()
Hi All,
I believe the marks on the blade next to the hilt are the Gujarati number 51. Sincerely, RobT |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 3
|
![]()
Thanks Rob
I think thats right, it would refer to the rack number |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,281
|
![]()
Excellent Rob!!!
That makes perfect sense!! and thank you for spotting this, I have found that pretty much there were two units using the M1853 pattern hilts per R. Wilkinson-Latham "Pictorial History of Swords and Bayonets" (1973), ...these were one listed as 'Fanes Horse' which is shown as 17th lancers. This unit was situated in Bengal and actually the unit known as Fanes Horse was the 19th Lancers. These were both Bengal units and I have always thought they used the1821 type hilts. On the other one, 31st Duke of Connaughts Own Lancers, which was commanded by the Duke of Connaught, who was also governor of the Bombay Presidency. This huge administrative region of the British Raj, extended from Bombay all the way to Sind which of course included Gujarat mid way in the time period we are considering, c. 1880-1905, The Gujarati numerals would have likely been rack number. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|