![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,339
|
![]()
I'd vote for number two Shahrial; the cup/mendak seems a better fit to the ukiran . I don't know whether it's in keeping or not but to my untrained eye it seems more balanced .
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,218
|
![]()
I would agree with Rick here for the very same reasons. The cup in the first combo appears just a little too large. I also like this second hilt a little better. But as for what would be more proper, i am afraid i am in the same boat as Rick.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,339
|
![]()
While we're on the subject of keris fashion; here's a new (to me) but old mendak I tossed on my Anak Alang. Is it in fitting with the style?
It seems to be silver on brass and nice work except for the missing ball. This doesn't strike me as a Jawa mendak. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,013
|
![]()
Looks like north coast Jawa or Madura to me, Rick.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,339
|
![]()
Fashion blunder .
![]() What I found interesting about this mendak is that one side had been purposely compressed to create an angled cup. Most unusual to my eyes. Anyway carry on . ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,180
|
![]()
I'm looking high and low for a Madurese mendak...
![]() For shahrial's keris, I think second one is better. The first hilt is nice, but shd have a Minang-style cup (with a long stem and deep bowl) rather than a straits Bugis-style cup. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,248
|
![]() Quote:
I agree that the 2nd looks better with a matching cup (pendongkok)... The first one, if use a Minang-styled cup would be too high. It's also hard to come by... ![]() Actually, looking at the 1st piece hilt, the lobe raising from the back of the head may represent a Garuda Mungkur form, and likely from Palembang. ![]() The 2nd hilt, although a different form, looks like a South Sumatran (Palembang) piece, as well. But at least the hilt ring/cup is in Central Sumatra form, looks matching... but I don't know...hmmm. ![]() Last edited by Alam Shah; 21st August 2006 at 12:18 PM. Reason: grammar... |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,248
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Some examples of Sumatran ring/cup (pendokok/pendongkok/pendoko). [link] An example of a Minangkabau form that would be fitting for your piece. [link] |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,248
|
![]()
The sheath form is found in Stone's, Pg:387, Fig: 483, #2. It seems like I'm talking to myself...
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,218
|
![]()
Don't worry Shahrial....it may seem like you are talking to yourself, but we're listening.
![]() It's hard to tell from the small pic in stone, but while similar, it does appear that your sheath has some subtle, but important differences, especially along the top in the curve of the "boat". Variation on a form....or different catagory...? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,248
|
![]()
Yup, agreed. The upper portion inwards curve is different. I agree with Michael's opinion on the daun, of Gayo influence...hmmm.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 84
|
![]()
Shah
The first combination -- the pendongko is a Bugis cup, definitely not a good fit. Keep looking for a suitable Minang style |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|