![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 341
|
![]()
Hi guys, good to be back
![]() Personally I find the depictions strikingly similar |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,218
|
![]()
Thanks for the better pictures Pusaka. Yes, i agree that they are strikingly similar and as Alan has stated, there is a strong line of development that seems to lead to a great influence from India. Generally, though, the keris as we know it is an asymmetric weapon while these are both fairly symmetric in form (the exception would be the keris sepang which is a relatively rare form and, i think, came a bit later in the evolution of the keris form). I think that most folks here probably buy into the concept of a strong Indian influence, though i would agree with Alan that the keris as we know it in it's asymmetric form probably developed in Jawa.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 341
|
![]()
It has what looks to be a primitive Gajah too!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,218
|
![]()
I see what you are looking at, but at this level of enlargement i would find it really hard to be definitive about that. I think we might all need to go on a field trip.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|