![]() |
![]() |
#31 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Germany
Posts: 270
|
![]() Quote:
Kind regards Robin |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,316
|
![]()
You are a very gracious man Robin. We all hate to be bearers of bad tidings but want to honest. It is a beautifully made sword regardless, and many collectors are aesthetic oriented seeing the artistic merits rather than historic elements. In cases like this, a little of both as the interpretations are often based on traditional and historic values.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Eastern Sierra
Posts: 501
|
![]()
Great point everyone. Really good discussion of an interesting item. Noone has mentioned something I find really interesting. The snake's head is on the inside (medial) aspect of the handle as it is carried. I guess that would make it more comfortable in the hand and could still be seen carried as a saber at an angle, but, still, it's an interesting design aspect to me.
The northern Indian/Afghan ideas seems a good one. The Afghans liked their swords in the 20th century to my understanding. The pommel shape looks familiar, is it a Deccan, Vijayanagar reference? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|