![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2023
Posts: 64
|
![]()
I attempted to take a picture to show the thinnest of the blade.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NC, U.S.A.
Posts: 2,156
|
![]()
The haft does indeed look very old. It could perhaps be a 'field piece', a primitive type spike axe/tomahawk. The langets not typical for -hawks, but there are so many variations based on the smith. It could still be a much earlier repurposed piece as well. I see what you mean about the thinning of the eye-
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2023
Posts: 64
|
![]()
Thanks again Mark for the comments. I found the attached image, No. 42, on the right, from the old book Armouries in the Tower of London. I though it bears some resemblance.
I gently cleaned the axe up a bit and, interestingly, the cutting edge and spike, appear to be forge welded in steel. The rest of the head what appears to be iron. Curious piece, in my opinion. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2023
Posts: 64
|
![]()
Also not sure whether this is a faded maker's mark. Hard to tell.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Scotland
Posts: 355
|
![]()
Yes, definitely looks more like a weapon with that thinness of blade, lightness helps with speed.
Fire axes/hatchets tend to be chunkier designed to break through doors or open up the roof to let smoke out. So, not a fire axe after all. Normal, of course, to have a steel insert for the blade. Unusual that the spike maybe steel as well. Sorry, can't help with the maker's mark. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|