Something worth a passing glance

[A. G. Maisey]

I am not much given to the show & tell thing, & I am not at all in favour of displaying any of my personal keris. However, this keris is about to go to a new home, and the pendok is one of the best that I have ever handled, it is the work of Pak Dayadi (Alm.) a formidable craftsman from Solo, who left us some years ago.

I have not seen work to rival this in many years.

I feel that this dress is worth a passing glance, perhaps a little more than this.

[A. G. Maisey]

Higher res pendok

[drdavid]

Amazing pendok Alan, thank you for showing. Should the iconography (5 claw dragon and Feng Hua) make us think this was made for someone prominent from a Chinese background
DrD

[A. G. Maisey]

No, not really, this is a late 20th Century Solonese pendok, the pattern books of the craftsmen who produce these works of art are full of motifs that come from many cultures. The execution of this particular pendok is vastly better than most examples that we might come across, but the actual motifs in this day & age are not exclusively Javanese.

[Green]

Interesting. But this Chinese motifs are not exactly an art in the original keris culture.By which I mean (currently Muslim Keris world of the nusantara) and even Hindu Bali? In fact I would hazard a guess that this is not typical and a one off.

I would be happy to be proven wrong and appreciate any explanation.

[A. G. Maisey]

The arts & crafts of both Jawa & Bali are influenced by other cultures. There are multiple examples of this. If we go back to the Central Javanese Classical period of around 600 to 1100CE, we find that at at that time Javanese art was influenced by Indian cultures, especially the Guptas.

In later times Chinese culture had extremely heavy influence on both Javanese & Balinese art. If we look at the Batik patterns of most especially the North Coast of Jawa what we find is both the use of Chinese motifs, and Javanese motifs that have been influenced by Chinese motifs. In Bali we again find that Chinese culture has permeated Balinese culture . A very good & well known example of this is the Barong dance.

European influence in Jawa has resulted in formal Javanese dress being a mixture of the indigenous sarung & the European waist length jacket. During the 19th century European influence so permeated the elite levels of Javanese society that by the time of Pakubuwana X the entire Karaton was following European style.

As for the idea of "--- original keris culture --- " it is undeniable that the people of any society own the culture that relates to that society, & in Jawa influences from outside the society have been accepted and adapted to Javanese use. At the present time it is almost impossible to separate elements of Javanese, & also Balinese, style that is absolutely indigenous to the the society & culture of Jawa & Bali, and that is not the result of the permeation of those societies & cultures by elements from outside the original society & culture. This gradual shaping of a culture & a society is an ongoing process:- the people who form the society own its related culture, & they decide what is a part of their culture & what is not.

In respect of this particular pendok, it is not a one off, I ordered it from the pattern book of Pak Dayadi. Over the time I knew this highly talented artist/craftsman I ordered other very high quality pendok from him also, & these were used on new, very high quality Kamardikan keris, some of the motifs would be recognizable as having their roots in indigenous Javanese motifs, for example, "sekar melati", however other motifs are undeniably European in origin, especially those that use grapes as the base motif, such as "sekar anggur" or "buah anggur". Other motifs might have the elements of the motif absolutely identifiable with Javanese roots, but then the execution of those elements will be in a style that is reminiscent of Chinese style, for example the "pring-pringan" motif.

What we are looking at with this particular pendok is an example of late 20th century Surakarta keris art that has been produced by one of the most highly respected and most talented Surakarta pendok artists of all time.

Yes, I agree, it is perhaps difficult to reconcile what can be seen in this pendok with what we usually see in a Javanese pendok, & this is quite simply because work of this level of excellence is almost never seen unless one has access to the elite artist/craftsmen of the World of the Keris, or perhaps people who might possess some of the work of these talented men.

[Green]

Totally understand what you are saying about how different outside cultures influence the indigenous art. But Java and Indonesia and the nusantara as a whole with the exception of Bali has been Muslim for many hundred years and Keris art has stabilised to a more Islamic way of looking at things although not entirely eschewing the older cultures particularly the use of naga motifs as naga has been a part of indigenous myth since the very beginning as well. However even naga motifs have the 'local look' instead of more chinese look as we(I) see in this particular example.

It is may be just me but I feel that this example has too Chinese look and does not really represent javanese or nusantara keris art.

[A. G. Maisey]

If you say so Green, but your perspective is perhaps not the perspective of the Javanese people:- they own their culture, & they decide what is a part of that culture.

As for Islam & Jawa, well, that has been a contentious matter for a very long time.

Keris art & the Islamic World view?

Yes, some influence, but in only some respects and in a very limited way.

In Jawa, and also in Bali, all things are understood in a Javanese way & in a Balinese way, and particularly where Islam is concerned, that way might not be in accord with the way in which things are understood in other parts of the Islamic world.

This does not just involve keris art, it involves the entire society of Jawa and of Bali. To understand the way in which these peoples see & understand the world around them, we need to at least try to adopt at least a similar way of seeing that world.

In fact, in Jawa, there is no "stabilisation" of keris art & most definitely not any general "stabilisation" that tends to an Islamic set of values.

If you do not like the motif used in this pendok, that opinion can be easily accepted if it offends your personal sense of values, but in Jawa & in Solo a great many people would have different opinions.

I'd guess that you would probably find the Batik motifs of Cirebon & Pekalongan unacceptable also.

[Green]

Fair statement Alan. I am a malay and certainly I have quite a different cultural background compared with the Javanese although we have many similarities as well. Malay and Javanese are quite different people in many ways although many would consider Javanese and Malay are essentially the same group of people while some others of more nationalistic bent vehemently claim that we are different races LOL.

But what I observe and historical events have amply showed that
Javanese are quite anti Chinese even to this day and it would be interesting if any Javanese in this group would comment what they think about the motif of this pendok.

[A. G. Maisey]

Whilst it is true that there are some genetic similarities between Malay & Javanese peoples, there are very great differences between Malay society as it exists in today's Malaysia, & Javanese society as it exists in today's Jawa.

It is also true that from the 19th century, when the Chinese were used by the Dutch as their managers, overseers, supervisors & hit men, the Javanese have, in general, harboured an intense dislike for the Chinese people living in Jawa, if we look at the historical contributions of the Chinese to Javanese & Balinese society & culture we find that much of what we now tend to regard as uniquely Javanese is in fact of Chinese origin.

Historically the Chinese have played an exceptionally important role in the development of Javanese art & culture. It is even possible that without the contribution of Chinese Muslims, Jawa might not be regarded as an Islamic state today.

In respect of the pendok, of course this motif is influenced by Chinese style, nobody can deny that, however, that Chinese style is now as much a part of Javanese art & culture as are the many other Chinese inspired motifs that are a part of Javanese art.

This discussion is in my opinion going nowhere, I made this photo of an exceptional piece of Javanese keris art available for public view to permit others to see what the best can look like, I did not make it available to open a discussion on whether Chinese influence can be found in Javanese art. This is a given, & it cannot be denied.

Similarly it cannot be denied that this Chinese influence can be seen in this piece of Javanese art work.

None the less, in the lexicon of Javanese art, Chinese inspired motifs do have a place and are legitimately identified as Javanese art at the present time.

I do acknowledge that not everybody might particularly like this motif, but I did not make it available to generate a poll on likes & dislikes, I made it available so that others may be able to see what superior craftsmanship looks like, and that is completely independent of personal likes & dislikes, it is something that must be an objective judgement.

[JustYS]

This high end templek pendok always amazed me, thank you for showing Alan.

Am I correct to guess the materials are silver and gold plated?

Also does the pendok motifs have a hierarchical rank like the pendok color? In a sense are there some motifs attributed to certain ranks?

Thank you.

[Gustav]

Superior craftmanship?