![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,854
|
![]()
I do not think this has anything to do with European/British steel or bayonet and blade forms. I think it has its origins in the spears from Indo/Persia and other Asian influences on Indonesia.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 940
|
![]()
Hey Henk, is the hilt easily removable like on a keris. It might be educational to have a look at the tang.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,280
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,209
|
![]()
Gentlemen, I'm very happy with your input.
Nechesh, I could remove the hilt and made some pictures of the tang. During taking the pictures I noticed a very small stamp on the blade, hardly visible, but the pictures don't lie. It is very hard to see what the mark is even under a magnifying glass. I asked my daughter to look for me and she saw something like a N and a 4 or a triangle. On the picture I have a better image and I see something as PM or PN but it is very small and hardly to see with naked eyes. Ki Jayamalelo showed a link of bayonets with a triangular one. If you look at such a bayonet it is attached with a round elbowformed tube to the socket. The tang of my blade is square and doesn't show signs of reattachement to the blade. As far as I know those reattachements or welding spurs are easily to discover. I've seen often reattached peksi's to keris. The place were the peksi is reattached is always thicker and visible. I would like to hear your comments on these facts. Alan, I hope you will react as well. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,854
|
![]()
Which way up is the mark read????
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,339
|
![]()
Well , I'm willing to eat my words .
![]() ![]() But what ? Plug bayonet ? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,209
|
![]()
Tim,
Now that I'm looking a bit better to the pictures you can read the mark with the point towards you as PM and with the angle towards you as NJ or something. I really cann't make anyting of it and better pictures than these are not possible. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,854
|
![]()
I still do not see a European bayonet. The mark, what we can see is not recognisably European. The brown bess type bayonets have thinner cutting edges.? They are not made of this type of steel. There seems to be no grinding on the blade? I suppose there is a wild chance that it could be some really early rich persons bayonet. Did rich people stand in line with bayonets?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,209
|
![]()
Not that I know, Tim. As far as I know farmers did join the battles of their lords in the middle ages. But their weapons where more their tools they used to work with on the fields. In the ages after the middle ages the battles where fought by armies with trained soldiers. But i don't know enough about this subject to give a good answer on that.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,015
|
![]()
Thanks for your invitation to comment further, Henk, but I really have nothing further to contribute.
I know nothing more, and I dislike hypothesis without evidence or logical argument. I do have a couple of these things around somewhere, if I can locate them I`ll post pics. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|