![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,842
|
![]()
Having been searching the inter net and seen many styles of handle fancy and plain to rough. I am not wholly convinced that this is not the original handle. Perhaps there was a cost to consider? Also look at the tang, shows no sign of of pining or peening just a tang to be secure by adhesive of some kind.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,164
|
![]()
Hello Tim,
I am pretty sure that it isn't the original/first handle. Albeit the handles on these swords can be simple but never crudely. Regards, Detlef |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]()
No chance, Tim - look at the metal work of the scabbard: If there are funds for this, there also are for at least a plain hilt.
This hilt will do in a pinch; stylistically, it just doesn't cut it, I'm afraid. Regards, Kai |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,842
|
![]()
I wonder if anybody has a more suitable handle.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: France
Posts: 208
|
![]()
Hi Tim,
Actually, in my opinion, only guard, blade and U frame in iron are original to the piece. The rest is a later addition/restoration probably made for sell it to tourists. If i ever find spare parts for the handle, i Will try to reach you. Best Julien |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,842
|
![]()
Hmm, not sure about that. It would have be extremely clever to include the marks left by a little finger ring.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,842
|
![]()
The coral turns out to be a moulded piece of glass. I wonder how many of the lower quality Tibetan weapons have glass pieces.
Last edited by Tim Simmons; 24th March 2023 at 02:43 PM. Reason: spelling |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|