![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Tyneside. North-East England
Posts: 616
|
![]()
Probably my favourite sword and one I have yet to acquire.
Here are two examples purely for entertainment. The first one (lattice basket) was auctioned by Czerny last year but was too expensive for my wallet. The second one is still for sale but you would need to re-mortgage your house to afford it. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Tyneside. North-East England
Posts: 616
|
![]()
Here is a part of the vendor's description of this spectacular sword and some more photos.
The basket hilt is encrusted in silver, the massive pommel is also silver and decorated with a figure of a noble - perhaps the original owner that commissioned the creation of this masterpiece. The lower hilt is most interesting in that it has a silver guard and original rain-guard built into the tang. The sheath is decorated in leather and pierced silver moulding, and silver extended chape. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Tyneside. North-East England
Posts: 616
|
![]()
Incidentally: that first sword I posted has obviously had the pommel replaced - perhaps by the original owner. The hook for the retaining ring to what was the cat's head is plainly visible.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Tyneside. North-East England
Posts: 616
|
![]()
Firstly, Cathey, please accept my grateful thanks for starting this thread.
Secondly, I suspect I am wrong about the pommel and hook. Looking at those dating images I see the hook is often present regardless of a retaining ring or hole for its location... sorry about that, I must stop trying to view on my phone. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Tyneside. North-East England
Posts: 616
|
![]()
I'm raising more questions I'm afraid.
First: what are those little hooks for, if not for attaching to the pommel? Second: is that a wootz blade!!! on the luxurious sword I posted? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: adelaide south australia
Posts: 284
|
![]()
Hi Urbanspaceman
I don’t think we are looking at a wootz blade, just some pixelization in the image on that one. I know the site it is currently posted on and some of the images always appear to be lower resolution and tend to pixelate. With regard to pommels, it appears the latter the sword the fancier the pommel. Also, if it is a fancier version obviously made to order the pommels again vary greatly. I have a sword with a plain Iron pommel that has a mark for the hole, which is not punched through. The brass pommels and wire wrapped guards appear more often on latter swords, the early one plain iron with leather wrapping sewn in place on the grips. My article research is progressing, so far I have had to google translate, Serbian, french, German and Italian. Here is my latest Schiavona probably around circa 1780. Note this one has a wire wrapped grip and the most complex hilt variety, being three rows of lattice pattern. This is the one where the hole in the pommel does not go through and at this stage, I have not been able to identify the mark on the forte. Cheers Cathey |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Sweden
Posts: 755
|
![]()
The last sword may be a composite. The iron pommel looks like a modern replacement to me. The blade does not seem to fit the lattice basket and does not seem to be original to it as the tang is visible and forms a ricasso. A similar composite is illustrated in “White Arms of the Royal Armoury” (Sweden, 1984) by Lena Nordström.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|