![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: Leiden, NL
Posts: 565
|
![]() Quote:
Maybe it starts with "ЗА" (FOR or PER according to google)? And I can see the remains of the rest of the date as an 8 at the end of the bottom row. That is interesting in itself, as I haven't really seen anything very similar in the (admittedly brief) time I've been collecting. Do these have kilij blades? If you have pictures or links I'd appreciate it. Last edited by werecow; 20th November 2022 at 03:33 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 84
|
![]()
I'm trying to search through my history to find the examples. Here is a link to an old 2004 post that I found last night wih some great information.
http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showthread.php?t=727 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 1,664
|
![]()
I am reading the inscription as "За Отличие въ Турецкой Войне", meaning "For Distinguishment in the Turkish War". To me, it is suspicious.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |||
Member
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: Leiden, NL
Posts: 565
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Quote:
Quote:
I doubt that. It's got the typical T-section and it isn't an overly clunky one. It seems it was made this way, at least. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 1,664
|
![]()
I suspect the inspiration for the etching came from signs, given to members of the Bulgarian Militia after the war. Not sure, but I suspect there was similar Russian insignia, on which the Bulgarian was based. The cross over a crescent is also a symbol of the victory in the 1877-78 Russo-Turkish War. The blade may be an authentic old blade, which has been "enhanced" in this manner and put into new, inaccurate dress.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: Leiden, NL
Posts: 565
|
![]()
Hah, that definitely looks familiar! Funny... I assumed that cross over crescent to be a combination of a cross and an anchor, as in naval markings (especially since the blade is also blued).
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 411
|
![]()
i would venture that the smaller of the two originally posted by ASPaulding may well be Egyptian.
Regards Richard |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: Leiden, NL
Posts: 565
|
![]()
Very excited today since I managed to get a hold of a pala that is very similar to the T-section one in the OP. I've been wanting one of these for many years.
I also snagged a rather rusty (more so than the picture suggests) and slightly bent Persian quaddara (quadara?) that will be a fun cleanup project at some point. Last edited by werecow; 7th June 2025 at 07:45 PM. Reason: Added two additional pictures since why not |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 84
|
![]()
It definitely seems like there has been a few Russian-Bugarian Ottoman inspire swords from that same time period. All are just diffrent in there on way. Yours looks like a Shamshir grip and gaurd while the blade is a Kilij. Is it possible your blade was modified to resemble a Kilij? I know nothing of the capabilities of modifing a blade. I once had a sabre that was straightend and modified to look like a 17th century Walloon.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
i looked at the better pics and suddenly it dawned on me: ” за отличие в турецкой войне”.
I was so proud of myself and scrolled down the page to publish my momentous discovery when I saw Teodor’s post…. Well, I got silver:-))) Or, as the Russians used to report the results of a duel between the American and the Russian runners: “Our runner came second and the American one came barely before the last”. Say whatever you want, the handle and the crossguard are typical Georgian. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|