![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 436
|
![]()
I agree with your statements. The blade looks crude, the koftgari has not seen use, and the blade profile seems somewhat unusual.
I'd have passed on it as well. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,854
|
![]()
Although this appears to be a fairly recent piece it does not mean that it does not belong to a tradition.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,280
|
![]()
I like the koftgari, but yes I have seen several of these on the market, new work from India.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 607
|
![]()
I'm glad that my suspicions are shared!
The piece was represented by the seller as a veritable antique, and that he's had it in his possession for several decades, which I didn't believe. Handling it...it just didn't feel "right". Thank you, all! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Eastern Sierra
Posts: 497
|
![]()
It looks like Rajasthan to me. The question I have wondered is are many of these old parts mixed with new, or all new with aging to some areas?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,280
|
![]()
I had one of these with Urdu on it the was made in the 1960s - several decades also therefore also.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Austria
Posts: 1,911
|
![]()
Yes, this is indeed of recent production.
Moreover, I do not consider this to be a pesh-kabz as it doesn't have any of the characteristics that define the pesh-kabz. It does neither have the long, sleek blade with a T- spine, nor the typical hilt adapted for under-hand grip. I would call this knife a zirah-bouk as it has the typical reinforced "armour piercing" tip. I have seen many modern versions of this type of knife but very, very few that are genuinely antique. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|