![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 905
|
![]()
Thank you Neil for your reply,
It was sold as a : 18th/19th replica of a 16th swiss double handed sword. Low starting price, the opportunity to have one of these and not a cold steel replica... Usually, it's a serious action house, So, where are the 18th parts ? ![]() ![]() The pommel and blade seemed old/ ok to me ( maybe náve 18/19th century trusting ...) During the same session, they were selling two other pieces sold as ''16 century style double handed swords'' without even the mention ''18/19th century'' for one and written '' probably 18/19 th century '' for the other one. Starting price: 1500 € ... ( weight 3600 kg and +/- same dimensions ...) The starting price for ''my'' sword was low Often they make tender bidding system. ( main auction ) swords starting 300€ and ending 4000... and sometimes unsold... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 905
|
![]()
Happy to have it after little work...
![]() A last question for specialists please : Why did bladesmiths make sharp edges for reproductions or parade swords ? Really, this one is one of the sharpest sword I have... For the ''old'' pommel , I found this look like on an old sword from a museum in Vienna. For the blade: I know that few years in soil car turn all rusty but I don't think the blade is 20 century with this black rust patina. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 905
|
![]()
Last one for the tip/blade structure.
Kind regards |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Scotland
Posts: 126
|
![]()
OK, I'll go along with the pommel, though that shape is unusual on 2-handers, and the pommel is the element most often replaced when a sword is being restored. As for the sharpness - a good repro has to be sharp otherwise it's not a good repro! I still feel that this is a repro, but a good one, and if I'm wrong then you have an even better bargain.
Neil |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 905
|
![]()
Hello,
I have a question about "replacement" pommels: I found other with the same shape ( one discussed on an old post ) on old two handed swords. are they typical of another period that confirm these are later pieces ? 19th century ?? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 905
|
![]()
I'd like to share with you the lines that appeared when I clean it another time and use this time grain 800 then 1000 again.
It is not that deep in the blade but deep enough for being revealed after a second lights sanding. Strange lamination (?) lines or remains of drawings ? More presents on one side but de can see them a little on both ( cf pics ) in any case it don't look like a modern damas... Don't know if it makes it an earlier or later model... Kind regards |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 66
|
![]()
An ''uraltes'' blade for break the silence !...
I hope this one will help. same ''lines'' and blade shape ( hexagonal section ) on an old italian model of two handed sword ( this one with a stamp )/mark ...) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,281
|
![]()
The marking appears to be the 'winged lion of St. Mark' as occurs on numbers of weapons from Venice and associated with the armouries of the Doge of Venice of earlier centuries.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|