![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,284
|
![]() Quote:
I have always recognized the axiom, 'weapon forms have no geographic boundaries' . Obviously certain forms had preferences in certain local regions and were preponderant in them, but was there some distinct characteristic that would signify a sword was specifically from the defined Saxon area? Clearly there have been notable geopolitical changes in this state over many centuries, so that further begs the question, what defines a Saxon sword? In the more recent centuries of course, military swords would have cyphers, inscriptions, coats of arms which specified Saxony, but with images of edged weapons without such identifying elements, what in the images in the OP signifies that these are 'Saxon'. The serpent on the ricasso in the second image is of course associated with Milan and used by makers variously in that context. Last edited by Jim McDougall; 29th September 2022 at 05:23 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2021
Location: Germany
Posts: 72
|
![]()
Thank you for your many responses. I really should have been more specific, I'm really concerned with the Saxon rapiers, daggers and estoc made for the Elector and for the Trabant Guard
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2021
Location: Germany
Posts: 72
|
![]() Quote:
the Reformation gave Saxony a very high status. I'll try to share what I know so far this weekend. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,284
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Black Forest, Germany
Posts: 1,231
|
![]()
It is interesting to know that the nearly same snake-mark is the sign of the DANNER-family at Nürnberg
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,284
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Black Forest, Germany
Posts: 1,231
|
![]()
Eugen Heer, Der Neue Stoeckel, Schwäbisch Hall 1978, 3 volumes, 2280 pages, this opus is a MUST!!!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,284
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2021
Location: Germany
Posts: 72
|
![]()
1.0
I try to give my opinion a little free rein here, I also listen to your opinions. I'm happy to accept additions and try to incorporate them. Of course, I will also name sources. I would like to start with what I think is the simplest variant The Saxon estoc with a simple eight-sided pommel and lines. Carried as a secondary weapon on horseback. In the version shown, probably for simple court servants on horseback. The version with different blades (triangular and square) and usually provided with the Pi brand. There were leather sleeves and metal sleeves for the transition from scabbard to blade. A chronological classification is difficult, but I assume 1590-1600. Sidenotes: 1. The mounted contingent of the Saxon Trebanten guard was formed of a company of one hundred men on black horses. 2.Their uniform included a blackened comb morion (a type of open helmet used from the middle 16th to early 17th centuries) with etched and gilt ornament, black doublets and yellow hose and stockings, the colours being those of the Arms of the Electors of Saxony. Source: Copyright © 2016 Peter Finer |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2021
Location: Germany
Posts: 72
|
![]()
1.1
2 estocs with triangular blades and the same pommel. From the Rüstkammer collection in Dresden. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|