![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 273
|
![]() Quote:
Kind regards, Yves |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
This is not my area of knowledge, but simply on general principles, how truly old is the blade of this « old warrior”?
I cannot see any edge nicks, signs of resharpening, scars or any expected consequences of actual use. I am not trying to cast doubt on the veracity of the seller, just interested in learnlng something new for me. Could it be a decorative/ceremonial/tourist version? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 273
|
![]() Quote:
1) 'how truly old is the blade of this old warrior'?- Before this talibong was purchased, a provenance was requested. From the first owner to the latest one (who eventually sold this piece). This piece was handed down for generations. And it's more than 100 years old; 2) this piece, in my opinion, is a heirloom piece. If you've read my original post, you would note that this piece (which is the female version), together with a male version(sapot) is offered as a dowry/gift to the parents of the bride before marriage. Never been used in battle (so there are no nicks, re-sharpening, scars). So, a ceremonial piece (not a tourist version nor for decorative purposes). Regards Yves |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
Got it.
So it is an old ceremonial sword and not an “old warrior”. Now I understand. Thanks for the information. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|