![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,114
|
![]()
I always find it interesting when something looks like a "user" rather than a "poser". I am profoundly ignorant of blades from this area, but also very interested in them..... to me this looks like a "user"!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 533
|
![]()
A. G. Maisey,
Thanks for the hilt ID. I agree with you that it is likely a homemade hilt. As I said before, the blade appears to be older than the hilt. Perhaps the original hilt was damaged and sword's owner couldn't afford a professionally made replacement. The carver did a nice abstraction for an amateur but better still, if it is a homemade hilt made by a member of traditional Indonesian society for an heirloom blade, it is unlikely that the hilt shape would be culturally inappropriate for the sword. I still wonder about the oddly shaped steel ferrule however. Was it part of the original hilt or was it made by a local smith for the new hilt? David R, Users are mostly what I collect. I have a few "Prince's" pieces but I am mostly interested in the type blade carried by the professional soldier or the baker's son. Sincerely, RobT |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,989
|
![]()
Definitely culturally appropriate.
I'd sooner not guess on the ferrule. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|