![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 52
|
![]()
Fair points. At this point I think we can only break it down into knowns, possibilities and unknowns:
Known: ivory handle, ottoman blade 16-17th century by characteristics Possibility: made pre 1822 regulation due to leather scabbard, Lancers by designs on scabbard Unknown: maker of blade, maker of sheath I think the designs on the scabbard NOT being found on anything other Lancers swords is semi-evidence of Lancer ownership. The regulation about scabbard material also points to pre-1822. Incredible sword, was hoping to find more sources but doesn’t seem to be a ton on these anywhere. Dellars companion volume is in the mail. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,224
|
![]()
Bryce, I love that pipeback sword with the feathered tip!
I recall Prosser made similar wide pipebacks for officers in the very early 19c. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: North Queensland, Australia
Posts: 189
|
![]()
I just found this image in my files. I don't know the source. It appears to have a Persian shamshir blade and the cross guard and scabbard bands associated with lancers.
G'day Kronckew, The 45th regiment mameluke is by Prosser. Here is a shot of two quillpoints in my collection. The bottom celtic hilt is also marked to Prosser, while the mameluke is unmarked. Cheers, Bryce |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: In the wee woods north of Napanee Ontario
Posts: 395
|
![]()
Great Celtic hilt. I know someone who recently found one but won't part with it.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2020
Posts: 38
|
![]()
Here is a Infantry Officer Mameluke 1815-1817 thats how long the furbisher was around for so its easy to date.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|