![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,015
|
![]()
Paul, it would be very unusual for a Tuban blade to have this pamor.
Tuban was not known for producing manipulated pamors of any kind. A full length photo + a photo of the top of the gonjo would be useful in assisting a possible identification. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 205
|
![]()
Here are some extra pics. Would welcome input.
It is really a big, strong and beefy blade. Maybe the pics don't tell. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,015
|
![]()
The pics tell very clearly Paul.
I would definitely accept this blade as stylistically Tuban. Quite unusual I think. I cannot recall seeing a Tuban blade with manipulated pamor. The details appear pretty crisp do we know where this has been? Reason I ask is because we expect Tuban blades to be old, rather than young, but if this went to Europe a two or three hundred years ago, it could well look like this |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|