![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Olomouc
Posts: 1,708
|
![]()
A friend was able to translate the script. Quite interesting... It says "beware of forgeries!"
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,145
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Unless Kronckew's sword is the forgery!! ![]() More seriously, it is very interesting. Thanks for the translation. Kronckew's hilt is the same. Kronck are you sure it is silver and not chrome?? Do you have the translation of yours? Iain are you aware of such things for mid and early 20th c. dha??? Is it a statment such as Coca Cola the original...? But in this case, this kind of sword should be more visible on the market. Two examples is not a lot... Strange. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,215
|
![]()
The best swords are forged.
![]() Many fakes are made by stock removal, not forging. Chrome does not tarnish black, as found in the deeper un-rubbed parts of the decorative areas on mine. The tarnish is more evident in the better pictures in my earlier thread.No chrome on mine. No wide fuller on the blade, either. It's also very thick at the root where it enters the grip, and is strongly distal tapered & razor sharp. The scabbard is a functional 'military' one, not a decorative thin silver-coloured thingy. The decorated brass or bronze bands are I gather typical for higher ranking army officers, with higher ranks having more bands. It owuld have had a baldric made of a heavy braided line like the one below, rather than the 'Royal' style on the above OP 'silver' scabbard. Haven't found anyone who can translate the inscription on mine, I feel it's a presentation statement. not many around who can read the older Burmese/Mon script. Last edited by kronckew; 5th August 2021 at 01:49 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: CHRISTCHURCH NEW ZEALAND
Posts: 2,786
|
![]()
Hi Kubur,
If you check out this link you will note that Burma has been called Burma for centuries, and as far as I can see from the Wiki history it has never been called Bassein. Therefore one can not use the counties name change, as stated in your reply to Ian, as a dating aid to your dha. The country is of course now called Myanmar. Like others I would date your dha as LATE 20th c at the earliest. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Myanmar Stu |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]()
Well, it's a town/city: an important port and capital of the district...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pathein |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,145
|
![]() Quote:
Stu, it is a town. Mid 20th c. by the latest!! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_rule_in_Burma |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: CHRISTCHURCH NEW ZEALAND
Posts: 2,786
|
![]() Quote:
Yes I agree it is a town, now called Pathein. The point I was trying to make was how you think that your dha originated there, unless of course it says so on the piece, and how you can date it based on the info you have. I think it is fair to say that most replies to your thread seem to think that it is a late 20th c piece. Stu |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,145
|
![]() Quote:
Of course you have a beautiful sword and I think our both swords were done by the same maker. Now the questions are Do you have the original scabbard? Or do we have both replacement scabbards? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,215
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,145
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Olomouc
Posts: 1,708
|
![]()
I would guess it was simply one smith or workshop who was perhaps annoyed at some cheaper competition...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,145
|
![]()
Hi guys,
Here are some photos of the blade, back edge flat then polygonal, one big fuller and some narrow above... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|