![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,116
|
![]()
I would look East, rather than into Africa.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: CHRISTCHURCH NEW ZEALAND
Posts: 2,786
|
![]()
Hi Ken,
Interesting old piece. A clue to origin could be the type of bird the feathers came from. If you have a knowledgeable ornotholigist nearby he could be well worth a visit. Stu Last edited by kahnjar1; 14th June 2021 at 10:35 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Ireland
Posts: 543
|
![]()
Thank you both for comments
I will have it in a week or so depending on courier. I have no Bird experts in my circle so I don't think that is going to help guestimate origin, I was wondering with the stud work might it be Native America? Or David do you have an Eastern country/region in mind I will post more images on receipt REgards Ken |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: CHRISTCHURCH NEW ZEALAND
Posts: 2,786
|
![]()
Hi Ken,
The leather reminds me more of Africa somewhere rather than European East. Stud work is quite common on North African guns and it would make sense to have some way of carrying over the shoulder. Perhaps more detail of those larger plates on the stock might help when you receive the piece. Stu |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,116
|
![]()
African trade guns are generally made in Europe, and so have pretty standard European stocks.
This is closer to Turkish-Iranian-Afghan styles. One giveaway is the ramrod housed in the wood of the stock, rather than in an exterior slot with tubes. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,145
|
![]()
Ok I will try this one
I think the leather strap and the feathers are just recent additions. Personally I will bin them. Your butt (your rifle) looks like a boyliya. I will say Ottoman gun from the Balkans, exported and refurbished in North Africa. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,116
|
![]()
Agreed. Probably a fairly late one but it fits with what we see here.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|